首页> 外文会议>ASME Bioengineering Conference >CHANGES IN FORAMINAL GEOMETRY WITH ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION VERSUS KEYHOLE FORAMINOTOMY IN THE CERVICAL SPINE: A BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION
【24h】

CHANGES IN FORAMINAL GEOMETRY WITH ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION VERSUS KEYHOLE FORAMINOTOMY IN THE CERVICAL SPINE: A BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION

机译:颈椎前减压与宫孔传染术的传染性几何变化:生物力学调查

获取原文

摘要

Cervical spondylosis can be treated with various surgical decompression techniques, notably anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior keyhole foraminotomy. Although each procedure has distinct methods, there is no compelling evidence in the literature to advocate one over the other. Furthermore, subtle differences within the techniques have yet to be examined such as the salvage or resection of uncovertebral joints during ACDF. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have not elucidated significant differences in pain improvement between ACDF techniques, and no study has compared clinical outcomes for ACDF versus posterior foraminotomy, the two most popular cervical decompression techniques to date. We provide benchtop evidence as to the relative effectiveness of foraminotomy, ACDF with or without resection, and a combination of all surgeries. We hypothesized that ACDF with uncovertebral resection would be most effective to open the neuroforamina. Results of this study inform best practices for cervical decompression surgeries.
机译:可以用各种外科减压技术治疗颈椎病,特别是前宫颈减压和融合(ACDF)和后孔孔传染术。虽然每个程序都有明显的方法,但文献中没有令人信服的证据来提倡一个。此外,在ACDF期间尚未检查技术内的微妙差异,例如未染色的未染色的关节挽救或切除。系统的评价和荟萃分析并未阐明ACDF技术之间的疼痛改善的显着差异,并且没有对ACDF的临床结果进行了比较了迄今为止的两个最受欢迎的宫颈减压技术。我们提供了基准证据,即面包素,ACDF的相对有效性,有或没有切除,以及所有手术的组合。我们假设具有未经甲板切除术的ACDF将是最有效的,可打开神经瘤。本研究的结果提供了宫颈减压手术的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号