首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine >Evaluation of the clinical guidelines for the management of angina pectoris with traditional Chinese medicine in multi-level hospitals
【24h】

Evaluation of the clinical guidelines for the management of angina pectoris with traditional Chinese medicine in multi-level hospitals

机译:多级医院中医药治疗心绞痛的临床指南评价

获取原文

摘要

Aim: To evaluate the quality and relevant factors of the clinical guidelines for the management of angina pectoris (ZYYXH/T17-2008) with traditional Chinese medicine by related physicians in hospitals of different level. Methods: Participants rated the quality of 28 indicators of the guidelines using a 4-point scale, 1 (very poor) to 4(very good). Demographic and professional information was recorded for these physicians after they had taken part in a clinical trial in which they treated 629 patients with angina pectoris according to and not to the guidelines. Rusult: Fifty physician participants completed a questionnaire about the quality of the clinical guidelines. Their mean age was 34.4 years, male was 40%. Among them, 60% participants worked in hospitals of level 2, others in level 3; 36% were residents, attending physicians 22%, associated chief and chief physicians were 20% and 22%, respectively. This guideline, which contained 6 domains and 28 items, was rated as “good”(median score was 3) by these participants. Physicians rated domain 2 (stakeholder involvement) and item 6(corporation among multiple disciplines) as the poorest one in their own groups, respectively. Domain 5(TCM characteristics) and item 14 (No-contradiction-among-contents) was rated as the best one, respectively. In regression models, level 2 hospital was significantly associated with higher score (better rating) assigned by these subjects to Domain 2, and 5, as well as item 6 and total score. The score for higher total score was significantly associated with younger age. Conclusions: The current clinical practical guidelines were “good” basing on a questionnaire survey. Stakeholder involvement and its sub-item corporation among multiple disciplines were the poorest indicators in the guidelines. The level of a hospital in which the appraiser was working was the strongest predictor of perceived evaluation of the guidelines.
机译:目的:评价各级医院有关医师治疗中风性心绞痛的临床指南(ZYYXH / T17-2008)的质量及相关因素。方法:参与者使用4分制从1(非常差)到4(非常好)对指南的28个指标进行了质量评定。这些医生参加了一项临床试验,其中记录了629例心绞痛患者的临床和非临床指南的人口统计学和专业信息。 Rusult:五十名医师参加者完成了有关临床指南质量的调查问卷。他们的平均年龄为34.4岁,男性为40%。其中,60%的参与者在2级医院工作,其他在3级医院工作;居民为36%,主治医师为22%,副主任医师和主任医师分别为20%和22%。该指南包含6个领域和28个项目,被这些参与者评为“良好”(中位数为3)。医师分别将领域2(利益相关者的参与)和项目6(多个学科的合并)评为各自小组中最差的一个。领域5(TCM特性)和项目14(无矛盾)分别被评为最佳。在回归模型中,2级医院与这些受试者分配给域2和5以及项目6和总分的较高分数(更好的评分)显着相关。总分越高,分数越高,年龄越小。结论:根据问卷调查,当前的临床实践指南是“良好”的。利益相关者的参与及其在多个学科中的子公司是指南中最差的指标。评估人员所在医院的级别是对指南进行感知评估的最强预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号