首页> 外文会议>International conference on information systems >How and When Review Length and Emotional Intensity Influence Review Helpfulness: Empirical Evidence from Epinions.com
【24h】

How and When Review Length and Emotional Intensity Influence Review Helpfulness: Empirical Evidence from Epinions.com

机译:审查的长度和情绪强度影响如何以及何时以及epinions.com的经验证据

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although longer reviews are generally considered more helpful, no research has investigated whether "the more the better" also applies to the expression of emotions. This paper explores the distinct effects of review length and emotional intensity. We propose that, in contrast to review length, the intensity of emotions has a negative effect on review helpfulness, and that this effect only applies to positive emotions. Additionally, drawing on elaboration likelihood model and the literature on the social functions of emotions, we predict that the respective effects of review length and emotional intensity are moderated by reviewer trustworthiness and the difficulty of reading review content. To test these hypotheses, we collected a rich data set from Epinions.com - a leading provider of consumer reviews. Our findings reveal the importance of taking the intensity of emotions into consideration when evaluating review helpfulness, and the results carry important practical implications.
机译:虽然较长的评论通常被认为更有用,但没有研究调查了“更好”也适用于情绪的表达。本文探讨了审查长度和情绪强度的不同影响。我们建议,与审查长度相比,情绪强度对审查助人的负面影响,并且这种效果仅适用于积极的情绪。此外,借鉴阐述似乎议会的似然模型和情感的社会功能的文献,我们预测审查人员可信度和阅读审查内容的难度调节审查长度和情绪强度的各自影响。为了测试这些假设,我们从Epinions.com收集了丰富的数据集 - 一个消费者评论的领先提供商。我们的调查结果揭示了在评估审查乐于效力时考虑到情绪强度的重要性,结果承担了重要的实际影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号