首页> 外文会议>ASME joint rail conference >ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LOW EMISSIONS YARD AND INDUSTRIAL SWITCHERS
【24h】

ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LOW EMISSIONS YARD AND INDUSTRIAL SWITCHERS

机译:低排放场和工业交换机的环境与经济分析

获取原文

摘要

As railroads and local industries served by rail seek to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency, new technologies are being developed to serve this market. Contrary to the minimal competitive options available over the last several decades, new companies are now emerging with a variety of locomotive designs aimed at low emissions and low horsepower solutions. Some technologies involve alternative fuels (e.g. natural gas, bio-diesel, battery power, etc.), while others incorporate very low horsepower diesel engines (400hp-1000hp) in order to meet the Tier 4 regulations set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Yet another option available to railroads and local industries is the mobile railcar mover. Typically used within railroad yard limits or on industry tracks, yard and industrial switchers and mobile railcar movers travel short distances, but must be capable of moving large loads. Subject to high forces when moving cars, these technologies must be both resilient (requiring minimal maintenance) and safe (not subject to derailment or loss of control). As the current market for yard and industrial switchers continues to expand, both railroads and local industries served by rail are placing greater emphases on the environmental and economic benefits of the emerging technologies. This paper aims to analyze the current yard and industrial switcher market and draw conclusions based on emissions data and lifecycle costs. Industrial switchers are compared with yard switchers and mobile railcar movers. Although industrial switchers are more limited in horsepower and operational versatility than yard switchers, many of the daily operations between the two are similar. Mobile railcar movers (e.g. Trackmobile ? and Rail King?) offer lower initial costs as well as the versatility of both on-track and off-track movement. However, they may require additional maintenance and offer reduced tractive effort compared to locomotive technologies. As the demands on railroad yard and industry operations grow increasingly complex due to environmental regulations and economic demands, these new technologies have the potential to increase competition in the marketplace and offer improved engineering solutions. By developing a hierarchy of key requirements of yard or industry switchers, this paper provides a framework for identifying the best options available to a railroad or local industries. The scope of this paper will include a review of all options available, but will place a greater emphasis on technologies that are commercially available for wide distribution. By sampling and analyzing the current industrial market, much insight can be gained into daily operational requirements and challenges faced by this sector of the industry.
机译:作为铁路服务的铁路和当地行业寻求减少排放,提高燃油效率,正在开发新技术来服务这个市场。与过去几十年中可用的最小竞争选项相反,新公司现已涌现出各种机车设计,旨在低排放量和低马力解决方案。有些技术涉及替代燃料(例如天然气,生物柴油,电池电量等),而其他技术则包含非常低的马力柴油发动机(400HP-1000HP),以满足环境保护局(EPA)设定的第4层规定)。铁路和地方行业提供的另一种选择是移动轨道车辆。通常在铁路码范围内或行业轨道,院子和工业切换器和移动轨道车辆行驶短距离,但必须能够移动大负载。在移动汽车时受到高力的影响,这些技术必须是弹性(需要最小的维护)和安全(不受脱轨或控制丧失)。随着当前的院子和工业切换器的市场继续扩大,铁路供应的铁路和当地行业都更加重视新兴技术的环境和经济效益。本文旨在分析当前院子里和工业切换市场,并根据排放数据和生命周期成本进行结论。将工业切换器与YARD切换器和移动轨道车移动器进行比较。虽然工业切换器在马力和操作多功能性比YARD切换器中更具限制,但两者之间的许多日常运营都是相似的。移动轨道车搬运工(例如,TrackMobile?和Rail King?)提供较低的初始成本以及跟踪和离轨道运动的多功能性。然而,与机车技术相比,它们可能需要额外的维护,并提供减少的牵引力。由于对环境法规和经济需求的对铁路院子和行业运营的需求越来越复杂,这些新技术有可能增加市场竞争,并提供改进的工程解决方案。通过开发院子或行业切换的关键要求的层次,本文提供了一个框架,用于识别铁路或当地行业的最佳选择。本文的范围将包括对所有可用选项的审查,但将更加强调可用于广泛分布的技术。通过抽样和分析目前的工业市场,可以获得许多洞察力,可以获得这一行业本领域面临的日常业务需求和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号