首页> 外文会议>ASME joint rail conference >DESIGN OF FLANGEWAY GAP FOR RESTRAINING RAIL NAZMUL HASAN
【24h】

DESIGN OF FLANGEWAY GAP FOR RESTRAINING RAIL NAZMUL HASAN

机译:铁路纳粹哈桑防空通道间隙设计。

获取原文

摘要

The aim of the paper is to classify restraining rail, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of restraining rail, derive the formula to determine the flangeway gap, and finally, to suggest a type of restraining rail for use. Three types of restraining rail are classified as:1. Active restraining rail: Defined as the restraining rail that reduces the angle of attack (AOA) by more than 50%.2. Semi-active restraining rail: Defined as the restraining rail that reduces the AOA by 50% or less, preferably between 40% - 50%.3. Passive restraining rail: Defined as the restraining rail that does not reduce the AOA. In other words, it plays a passive role in steering the wheel.A design procedure is established to estimate the flangeway gap. The advantages and disadvantages of each type of restraining rail are discussed from design, maintenance, and functional points of view. The issue of optimization of the rail/wheel profile is also discussed in context with the presence of restraining rail.One component of the flangeway gap is the space required for the angularity of the wheel. 2D CAD drawings are not efficient for this purpose, as the drawings cannot consider the AOA and the height of restraining rail on top of the rail level.In this context, Nytram plot is a solution; however, the plot needs a number of sectional drawings at gauge point level, rail level, and the top-of-restraining-rail level from the 3D drawing. A mathematical model that counts both the AOA and the height of restraining rail from the top of the rail level is developed here to capture the essence of the Nytram plot, and thereby to assess the space required for the angularity of the wheel. Finally, a semi-active restraining rail, with a formula for flangeway gap, is suggested for use. Being less elaborate and less time consuming, the formula is easier and quicker than the Nytram plot to estimate flangeway gap. Moreover, one can quickly assess the effect of wheel size, the height of the restraining rail from the top of rail, and the radius of the curve on the flangeway gap.
机译:本文的目的是对约束轨进行分类,讨论每种约束轨的优缺点,推导确定翼缘间隙的公式,最后提出一种使用类型的约束轨。三种类型的约束轨分为:1.约束轨。主动约束轨:定义为可将迎角(AOA)减小50%以上的约束轨2。半主动式限制轨:定义为可将AOA降低50%或更少(最好在40%-50%之间)的限制轨3。被动约束轨:定义为不降低AOA的约束轨。换句话说,它在方向盘转向中起着被动的作用。建立了一个设计程序来估算轮缘间隙。从设计,维护和功能的角度讨论了每种类型的约束导轨的优缺点。在存在约束轨道的情况下,还讨论了优化轨道/车轮轮廓的问题。翼缘间隙的一个组成部分是车轮倾斜度所需的空间。 2D CAD图纸对于此目的而言效率不高,因为图纸无法考虑AOA和在导轨水平上方的约束导轨的高度。在这种情况下,Nytram图是一种解决方案。但是,该图需要3D工程图中的轨距,轨距和约束轨顶部的水平处的多个剖视图。在此建立了一个数学模型,该模型同时计算了AOA和从钢轨顶部到顶部的约束钢轨的高度,以捕获Nytram图的本质,从而评估车轮倾斜度所需的空间。最后,建议使用半主动式约束轨道,该轨道具有公式的法兰间隙。与Nytram图相比,该公式不那么复杂,也更节省时间,因此可以更加轻松快捷地估算出法兰间隙。而且,可以快速评估车轮尺寸,约束导轨距导轨顶部的高度以及弯道间隙上弯道半径的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号