首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Software Measurement;International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement >Analysis of the Per-Unit Work Effort and Per-Unit Work Cost of the Web Information Portal Enhancement -- A Case Study from Poland
【24h】

Analysis of the Per-Unit Work Effort and Per-Unit Work Cost of the Web Information Portal Enhancement -- A Case Study from Poland

机译:网络信息门户加强的每单位工作努力和每单位工作成本分析 - 以波兰为例

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we present a case study on tender competition concerning the enhancement of Web Information Portal (WIP) of one of the largest public institutions in Poland in which one of the three potential developers offered possibility to enhance such system at the cost of 300 US dollars per 1 Function Point (FP) of the Common Software Measurement International Consortium (COSMIC) method, whereas the other two attempted to prove that the enhancement of WIP at such unit cost is not possible to carry out. According to them, the unit cost was underestimated even several times. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate it is possible to carry out enhancement of the WIP at the above mentioned per-unit cost and consequently that the offer of a certain company does not feature the so-called abnormally low tender price as defined in the act "Public Procurement Law", which makes it impossible to choose given tenderer due to the legal reasons. The analysis served as a main basis for settling legal dispute between a company offering values of attributes that are being analysed in the paper and the competing companies - in favour of a company having been selected by client as the company had proved that in the discussed area the selection of developer was made in accordance with the Polish law.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一个关于波兰最大的公共机构之一的Web信息门户网站(WIP)的招标竞争案例研究,其中三个潜在的开发商之一提供了以300美元的成本提升此类制度的可能性每1个功能点(FP)的常见软件测量国际财团(COSMIC)方法,而另外两次试图证明这种单位成本的增强是不可能进行的。根据他们,单位成本甚至低估了几次。本文的目标是证明可以在上述每单位成本下进行WIP的增强,因此,某个公司的提议并不具有如所定义的所谓的异常低价的价格。行为“公共采购法”,这使得由于法律原因而无法选择给予投标人。该分析曾担任在涉及本文分析的属性价值的公司之间建立法律纠纷的主要基础 - 赞成公司已被客户选择的公司,因为该公司已证明在讨论的地区根据波兰法律,开发商的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号