...
首页> 外文期刊>Generation, Transmission & Distribution, IET >Per-unit power costs of traditional and innovative OHLs: a multi-criteria comparison
【24h】

Per-unit power costs of traditional and innovative OHLs: a multi-criteria comparison

机译:传统和创新OHL的单位电费:多标准比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The need to increase power transmission capability in electrical power systems led to the proposal of possible alternatives to the traditional three-phase (3P) AC overhead transmission lines (OHLs). In addition to high-voltage DC connections, the alternatives include non-conventional solutions such as 4P AC lines and combined AC-DC lines. All these solutions have been examined in recent works where, however, the technical and economic aspects are usually separately analysed. On the contrary, a proper comparison among different solutions requires a combined technical-economic evaluation and, therefore, a systematic methodology based on a multi-criteria approach. This study compares the various possible OHL solutions resorting to an original methodology that joins technical and economic aspects. The former are taken into account by means of the loadability curves (properly computed for each solution). The latter include various cost items (for investment, energy losses, reliability and land occupation) computed for each solution. The different aspects are joined by computing the per-unit-of-transportable-power cost of each solution. This parameter provides, for any given line length, a total cost normalised in terms of the theoretical transmission capability of each solution and, thus, an interesting comparison tool among different solutions.
机译:在电力系统中增加电力传输能力的需求导致了对传统的三相(3P)AC架空传输线(OHL)的可能替代方案的提议。除了高压DC连接之外,替代方案还包括非常规解决方案,例如4P AC线和组合式AC-DC线。所有这些解决方案都在最近的工作中进行了检查,但是,通常会分别分析技术和经济方面。相反,在不同解决方案之间进行适当的比较需要对技术经济进行综合评估,因此需要基于多准则方法的系统方法。这项研究比较了各种可能的OHL解决方案,这些解决方案采用了结合技术和经济方面的原始方法。前者是通过载荷曲线来考虑的(针对每个解决方案正确计算)。后者包括为每个解决方案计算的各种成本项目(用于投资,能源损失,可靠性和土地占用)。通过计算每种解决方案的每单位可运输功率成本来结合不同方面。对于任何给定的线长,此参数提供了根据每种解决方案的理论传输能力标准化的总成本,因此,这是不同解决方案之间一种有趣的比较工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号