【24h】

An empirical analysis on academic innovation

机译:学术创新的实证分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper aims to explain empirically the effects of basic science outcomes by universities and public institutes on firms' performance. Although we believe that the basic science of universities and public institutes contributes to product innovation for firms, it is not necessarily explained based on evidence. We think that it is contribution for innovation management to explain empirically how basic science helps firms' performance. Therefore, we obtained data through an original questionnaire survey we had delegated an investigation company to carry out. Those surveyed comprised 20455 firms registered as Internet monitors throughout the country and covering all industries. In this paper, we used the data of 5360 firms of these firms (response rate was about 25%). Based on this data, we analyzed using ordered probit model and poisson model according to distribution of response results. As a result, we found that larger firms tend to produce goods or services based on basic research outcomes of universities and public institutes in manufacturing while it is not true for non-manufacturing firms. In addition, we found that the accumulation of researchers of science and technology in each area has some effects only in manufacturing.
机译:本文旨在从经验上解释大学和公共机构的基础科学成果对企业绩效的影响。尽管我们认为大学和公共机构的基础科学有助于企业进行产品创新,但不一定基于证据对其进行解释。我们认为,创新管理可以凭经验解释基础科学如何帮助企业绩效。因此,我们通过委托调查公司执行的原始问卷调查获得了数据。接受调查的公司包括20455家在全国范围内注册为Internet监控器并覆盖所有行业的公司。在本文中,我们使用了这些公司中的5360家公司的数据(响应率约为25%)。基于这些数据,我们根据响应结果的分布情况使用有序概率模型和泊松模型进行了分析。结果,我们发现大型企业倾向于根据大学和公共机构在制造业方面的基础研究成果来生产商品或服务,而非制造业企业则并非如此。此外,我们发现各个领域的科学技术研究人员的聚集仅对制造业有一定影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号