【24h】

Metaphor or diagram?

机译:隐喻还是图表?

获取原文

摘要

This paper aims at answering the question how ambient displays can be used as group mirrors to support collaborative (learning) activities. Our research question is to what extent the type of feedback representation affects collaborative processes. Two different representations have been created and compared in a user study: a diagram and a metaphor. In the diagram version the quality rating for each person is explicitly shown in charts and numbers. In the metaphorical representation feedback is implicitly visualized by changing certain characteristics of a pictorial scene. The results show that the metaphoric group mirror was not only more popular than the diagram, it also had a greater impact on the group behavior. When receiving negative feedback from the metaphoric group mirror, a correction of behavior was made significantly faster than with the diagram. Furthermore, both group mirrors had a positive effect on the self-regulation of the group compared to the baseline condition without feedback.
机译:本文旨在回答以下问题:如何将环境显示用作组镜以支持协作(学习)活动。我们的研究问题是反馈表示的类型在多大程度上影响协作过程。在用户研究中创建并比较了两种不同的表示形式:图表和隐喻。在图表版本中,每个人的质量等级均以图表和数字形式明确显示。在隐喻表示中,通过更改绘画场景的某些特征来隐式可视化反馈。结果表明,隐喻群体镜像不仅比图表更受欢迎,而且对群体行为的影响更大。当从隐喻组镜像接收到负面反馈时,行为校正的速度明显快于图表。此外,与没有反馈的基线情况相比,两个组镜都对组的自我调节产生积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号