首页> 外文会议>Safety, Security Rescue Robotics (SSRR), 2009 >Experimental comparison of robotics locomotion with passive tether and active tether
【24h】

Experimental comparison of robotics locomotion with passive tether and active tether

机译:被动系绳和主动系绳的机器人运动实验比较

获取原文

摘要

Most small robots require a tethered connection with a power and control source. The tether has advantages, namely robust communication and safe recovery, and disadvantages, tangling with obstacles and rough terrain. Active tether is a new research area for tethered robot systems. It provides continuously distributed form of actuation for robots that results from the effect of water hammer. It also reduces the friction of the tether by the jerks from the water hammer effect. In this paper, we duplicate the active tethered system and test the performance of the active tethered system by comparing it with passive tethered system under our test conditions for mobile robot. The two experimental comparison tests are distance test and drag test, which all show the advantage of the active tethered system. Furthermore, we address the broad impact of this novel form of locomotion.
机译:大多数小型机器人都需要与电源和控制源进行栓系连接。系绳具有优势,即强大的通讯能力和安全的恢复能力,以及劣势(与障碍物和崎terrain地形纠缠不清)。主动系绳是用于系绳机器人系统的新研究领域。它通过水锤的作用为机器人提供了连续分布的致动形式。它还可以减少由于水锤效应而产生的抽搐,从而减轻系绳的摩擦。在本文中,我们复制了主动系留系统,并通过在移动机器人的测试条件下将其与被动系留系统进行比较来测试主动系留系统的性能。两项实验比较测试是距离测试和阻力测试,它们都显示了主动系留系统的优势。此外,我们讨论了这种新颖形式的运动的广泛影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号