首页> 外文会议>Medical Imaging 1997: PACS Design and Evaluation: Engineering and Clinical Issues >Comparing the security risks of paper-based and computerized patient record systems
【24h】

Comparing the security risks of paper-based and computerized patient record systems

机译:比较纸质和计算机化患者记录系统的安全风险

获取原文

摘要

Abstract: How should hospital administrators compare the security risks of paper-based and computerized patient record systems. There is a general tendency to assume that because computer networks potentially provide broad access to hospital archives, computerized patient records are less secure than paper records and increase the risk of breaches of patient confidentiality. This assumption is ill-founded on two grounds. Reasons exist to say that the computerized patient record provides better access to patient information while enhancing overall information system security. A range of options with different trade-offs between access and security exist in both paper-based and computerized records management systems. The relative accessibility and security of any particular patient record management system depends, therefore, on administrative choice, not simply on the intrinsic features of paper or computerized information management systems. !13
机译:摘要:医院管理员如何比较纸质和计算机化患者记录系统的安全风险。普遍倾向于假设,因为计算机网络可能提供广泛访问医院档案,所以计算机化的患者记录比纸张记录更少,并增加违反患者保密的风险。这个假设在两个场地上没有创造。存在的原因是说计算机化的患者记录可以更好地访问患者信息,同时增强整体信息系统安全性。在基于纸张和计算机化的记录管理系统中,存在访问和安全性之间的不同权衡的一系列选项。因此,任何特定患者记录管理系统的相关访问和安全性取决于行政选择,而不仅仅是纸张或计算机化信息管理系统的内在特征。 !13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号