首页> 外文会议>Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, 1989. IECEC-89., Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety >System simulation and comparison of advanced flue gas clean-up processes in coal-fired power plant using SALT code
【24h】

System simulation and comparison of advanced flue gas clean-up processes in coal-fired power plant using SALT code

机译:使用SALT代码对燃煤电厂先进烟气净化过程进行系统仿真和比较

获取原文

摘要

The authors report on the use of the System Analysis Language Translator (SALT) computer code to evaluate the cleanup performance and cost of several advanced flue-gas cleanup (FGC) processes, including fluidized-bed copper oxidization (FBCO), fluidized-bed sodium absorption (FBSA), electron-beam/spray-dryer (EBSD), and electron-beam/ammonia-injection (EBAI) processes. The simulation results show that: (1) All four FGC processes can be expected to remove over 90% of the SO/sub x/ and over 95% of the NO/sub x/ from the flue gas of a coal-fired power plant. (2) The EBAI model has the highest NO/sub x/ removal efficiency for given pollutant emission constraints. (3) Cleanup cost is about 3 to 35% of the electric cost, depending primarily on the required SO/sub x/ removal efficiency and the type of FGC process. (4) Cleanup cost for an FBCO or FBSA process is cheaper than that of an EBAI or EBSD process.
机译:作者报告了使用系统分析语言转换器(SALT)计算机代码来评估几种先进的烟道气净化(FGC)工艺的净化性能和成本,包括流化床铜氧化(FBCO),流化床钠吸收(FBSA),电子束/喷雾干燥器(EBSD)和电子束/氨注入(EBAI)工艺。仿真结果表明:(1)可以预期所有四个FGC工艺都能从燃煤电厂的烟气中去除90%以上的SO / sub x /和95%以上的NO / sub x /。 。 (2)在给定的污染物排放限制条件下,EBAI模型具有最高的NO / sub x /去除效率。 (3)清理成本约为电力成本的3%至35%,这主要取决于所需的SO / subx /去除效率和FGC工艺的类型。 (4)FBCO或FBSA流程的清理成本比EBAI或EBSD流程的清理成本低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号