【24h】

Timed Negotiations

机译:定时谈判

获取原文

摘要

Negotiations were introduced in [6] as a model for concurrent systems with multiparty decisions. What is very appealing with negotiations is that it is one of the very few non-trivial concurrent models where several interesting problems, such as soundness, i.e. absence of deadlocks, can be solved in PTIME [3]. In this paper, we introduce the model of timed negotiations and consider the problem of computing the minimum and the maximum execution times of a negotiation. The latter can be solved using the algorithm of [10] computing costs in negotiations, but surprisingly minimum execution time cannot. This paper proposes new algorithms to compute both minimum and maximum execution time, that work in much more general classes of negotiations than [10], that only considered sound and deterministic negotiations. Further, we uncover the precise complexities of these questions, ranging from PTIME to △_2~p -complete. In particular, we show that computing the minimum execution time is more complex than computing the maximum execution time in most classes of negotiations we consider.
机译:谈判在[6]中被引入作为具有多方决策的并发系统的模型。谈判非常吸引人的地方在于,它是极少数非平凡的并发模型之一,在该模型中,可以在PTIME中解决一些有趣的问题,例如健全性(即没有死锁)[3]。在本文中,我们介绍了定时协商的模型,并考虑了计算协商的最小和最大执行时间的问题。后者可以使用[10]谈判中的计算成本算法来解决,但令人惊讶的是,最短执行时间无法解决。本文提出了一种新算法来计算最小执行时间和最大执行时间,它们比[10]中只考虑合理的和确定性的谈判,在更广泛的谈判类别中工作。此外,我们揭示了这些问题的精确复杂性,范围从PTIME到△_2〜p -complete。特别是,我们表明,在我们考虑的大多数协商中,计算最小执行时间比计算最大执行时间更为复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号