首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Radioelektronika >Comparison of two objective methods of quality assessment for digital audio broadcasting
【24h】

Comparison of two objective methods of quality assessment for digital audio broadcasting

机译:比较两种客观的数字音频广播质量评估方法

获取原文

摘要

Monitoring of the audio content quality is important for Digital Audio Broadcasting. Although the subjective methods asses quality more reliably, the objective methods have to be considered when needed big amount of the repeated tests. The highest differences between results of objective and subjective assessment were proved for modern high efficient codecs in the case of the lower bitrates. In this paper, two objective methods, PEAQ and PEMO-Q, are compared to be able to choose the more reliable method for audio quality monitoring. It is shown that PEMO-Q gives better results in the case of lower bitrates for the both High Efficiency profiles of Advanced Audio Coding codec. But the improvement is not essential considering the differences between results of the objective and the subjective assessment methods. Moreover, for music samples, PEMO-Q method brings worse results in the case of lower bitrates for Low Complexity profile of Advanced Audio Coding codec.
机译:音频内容质量的监视对于数字音频广播很重要。尽管主观方法可以更可靠地评估质量,但是当需要大量重复测试时,必须考虑客观方法。在较低比特率的情况下,现代高效编解码器的客观评估结果和主观评估结果之间的差异最大。本文比较了两种客观方法,即PEAQ和PEMO-Q,以便能够选择更为可靠的音频质量监控方法。结果表明,对于高级音频编码编解码器的两个高效配置文件,在较低比特率的情况下,PEMO-Q都能提供更好的结果。但是,考虑到目标结果与主观评估方法之间的差异,改进并不是必需的。此外,对于音乐样本,在高级音频编码编解码器的“低复杂度”配置文件的比特率较低的情况下,PEMO-Q方法会带来较差的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号