首页> 外文会议>International symposium on algorithmic game theory >Simple Games Versus Weighted Voting Games
【24h】

Simple Games Versus Weighted Voting Games

机译:简单游戏与加权投票游戏

获取原文

摘要

A simple game (N,v) is given by a set N of n players and a partition of 2~N into a set L of losing coalitions L with value v(L) = 0 that is closed under taking subsets and a set W of winning coalitions W with v(W) = 1. Simple games with α = min_(p≥0) max_(w∈w, L∈L) (p(L))/(p(W)) < 1 are exactly the weighted voting games. Freixas and Kurz (IJGT, 2014) conjectured that α ≤ 1/4n for every simple game (N,v). We confirm this conjecture for two complementary cases, namely when all minimal winning coalitions have size 3 and when no minimal winning coalition has size 3. As a general bound we prove that α ≤ 2/7n for every simple game (N,v). For complete simple games, Freixas and Kurz conjectured that α = O(√n). We prove this conjecture up to a ln n factor. We also prove that for graphic simple games, that is, simple games in which every minimal winning coalition has size 2, computing α is NP-hard, but polynomial-time solvable if the underlying graph is bipartite. Moreover, we show that for every graphic simple game, deciding if α < a is polynomial-time solvable for every fixed a > 0.
机译:一个简单的游戏(N,v)由一组n个参与者组成,并将2〜N划分为一组L的亏损联盟L,其值v(L)= 0,在取子集和W下关闭v(W)= 1的获胜联盟W的总和。α= min_(p≥0)max_(w∈w,L∈L)(p(L))/(p(W))<1的简单博弈正好是加权投票游戏。 Freixas和Kurz(IJGT,2014)推测,每个简单游戏(N,v)的α≤1 / 4n。我们在两个互补的情况下证实了这个猜想,即当所有最小获胜联盟的规模都为3且没有最小获胜联盟的规模为3时。作为一般边界,我们证明对于每个简单游戏(N,v),α≤2 / 7n。对于完整的简单游戏,Freixas和Kurz推测α= O(√n)。我们证明这个猜想直到一个ln n因子。我们还证明,对于图形简单游戏,即每个最小获胜联盟的大小为2的简单游戏,计算α是NP难的,但是如果基础图是二分的,则多项式时间可解。此外,我们表明,对于每个图形简单游戏,确定对于每个固定a> 0,α

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号