首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering >Performance Comparison Between AES256-Blowfish and Blowfish-AES256 Combinations
【24h】

Performance Comparison Between AES256-Blowfish and Blowfish-AES256 Combinations

机译:AES256-Blowfish和Blowfish-AES256组合之间的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

Security level is an essential feature of a cryptographic algorithm. Performing two well known cryptographic algorithms may improve a possibility to gain higher security level. This research implements a composite cryptosystem, which consists of AES256 and Blowfish algorithms. In combining AES256 and Blowfish, two options are available. The first option executes the AES256 followed by Blowfish (AES256-Blowfish). The second option is performing Blowfish and followed by AES256 (Blowfish-AES256). Security level in this research is measured by the required time to decrypt the ciphertext. Longer decryption time lead to a longer time to perform a brute force attack to get the original text message, therefore more secure. Experiment result shows that a composite cryptosystem on AES256-Blowfish required longer decryption time compare to the composite cryptosystem in reverse order (Blowfish-AES256).
机译:安全级别是密码算法的基本功能。执行两种众所周知的密码算法可以提高获得更高安全级别的可能性。这项研究实现了一个复合加密系统,该系统由AES256和Blowfish算法组成。在结合使用AES256和Blowfish时,有两个选项可用。第一个选项执行AES256,然后执行河豚(AES256-Blowfish)。第二个选项是执行Blowfish,然后执行AES256(Blowfish-AES256)。本研究中的安全级别通过解密密文所需的时间来衡量。更长的解密时间导致更长的时间执行蛮力攻击以获取原始文本消息,因此更加安全。实验结果表明,与反向顺序的复合密码系统(Blowfish-AES256)相比,AES256-Blowfish的复合密码系统需要更长的解密时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号