首页> 外文会议>IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >UX Professionals' Definitions of Usability and UX - A Comparison Between Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France and Malaysia
【24h】

UX Professionals' Definitions of Usability and UX - A Comparison Between Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France and Malaysia

机译:用户体验专业人员对可用性和用户体验的定义-土耳其,芬兰,丹麦,法国和马来西亚之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper examines the views of user experience (UX) profession- als on the definitions of usability and UX, and compares the findings between countries and within different socio-cultural groups. A mixed-method analysis was employed on data gathered on 422 professionals through a survey in Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France, and Malaysia. Usability appears to be an established concept, respondents across all countries agreeing on the importance of the ISO 9241-11 definition. There is also a tendency that UX professionals attach organizational perspective to usability. UX professionals diverge when defining UX, and there are systematic differences related to socio-cultural conditions. UX professionals in Finland and France incline more towards the definition highlighting the experiential qualities, when compared to Turkey and Malaysia that incline towards the definition reflecting the ease of use, utility, attractiveness, and degree of usage. Further research should address the implications of the diverse meanings and contexts of usability and UX.
机译:本文研究了关于可用性和UX定义的用户体验(UX)专业观点,并比较了国家之间以及不同社会文化群体中的发现。通过在土耳其,芬兰,丹麦,法国和马来西亚进行的一项调查,对来自422名专业人员的数据进行了混合方法分析。可用性似乎已成为一个既定概念,所有国家/地区的受访者都同意ISO 9241-11定义的重要性。 UX专业人员也倾向于将组织的观点附加到可用性上。用户体验专业人员在定义用户体验时会有所不同,并且在社会文化条件方面存在系统性差异。与土耳其和马来西亚相比,芬兰和法国的UX专业人士更倾向于强调体验质量的定义,而土耳其和马来西亚则倾向于反映易用性,实用性,吸引力和使用程度。进一步的研究应解决可用性和用户体验的各种含义和上下文的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号