首页> 外文会议>IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >UX Professionals' Definitions of Usability and UX - A Comparison Between Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France and Malaysia
【24h】

UX Professionals' Definitions of Usability and UX - A Comparison Between Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France and Malaysia

机译:UX专业人员的可用性和UX的定义 - 土耳其,芬兰,丹麦,法国和马来西亚的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper examines the views of user experience (UX) professionals on the definitions of usability and UX, and compares the findings between countries and within different socio-cultural groups. A mixed-method analysis was employed on data gathered on 422 professionals through a survey in Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France, and Malaysia. Usability appears to be an established concept, respondents across all countries agreeing on the importance of the ISO 9241-11 definition. There is also a tendency that UX professionals attach organizational perspective to usability. UX professionals diverge when defining UX, and there are systematic differences related to socio-cultural conditions. UX professionals in Finland and France incline more towards the definition highlighting the experiential qualities, when compared to Turkey and Malaysia that incline towards the definition reflecting the ease of use, utility, attractiveness, and degree of usage. Further research should address the implications of the diverse meanings and contexts of usability and UX.
机译:本文介绍了用户体验(UX)专业人员对可用性和UX定义的看法,并比较了各国与不同社会文化群体之间的调查结果。通过土耳其,芬兰,丹麦,法国和马来西亚的调查,在422名专业人员收集的数据上采用了混合方法分析。可用性似乎是既定的概念,跨越所有国家的受访者,同意ISO 9241-11定义的重要性。 ux专业人员还有一个倾向于将组织视角附加到可用性。 UX专业人士在定义UX时分歧,与社会文化条件有系统的差异。芬兰和法国的UX专业人士在与土耳其和马来西亚相比,突出了实验性质的定义,倾向于反映使用易用,效用,吸引力和使用程度的定义。进一步的研究应解决各种含义和可用性和UX的含义的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号