首页> 外文会议> >Finding the suitable process modeling for AIS teaching: An experimental study
【24h】

Finding the suitable process modeling for AIS teaching: An experimental study

机译:寻找适合AIS教学的过程模型:实验研究

获取原文

摘要

Process modeling has long become an essential skill in Accounting Information System (AIS) assurance, analysis and design practice. As the result, many accounting curriculums have been mandating that process modeling languages and skills be introduced and taught to future system analysts accounting students. The purpose of this research is to empirically seek whether a suitable business process model can be used that is easily understood by users. Furthermore, the present study strives for potential contribution from itself whose result can serve as the input for teaching in information-system oriented subjects in accounting curriculum. To achieve the objective, comparison was made between UML 2.0 Activity Diagram with BPMN grammar to seek potential future adoption for better and understandable process modeling language. Meanwhile the earlier hypothesis was BMPN with its advantage on wider symbol number, the results showed that, despite showing only slight differences in results, UML 2.0 Activity Diagram can be more easily understood by the user compared with BPMN. Our findings suggest that the better teaching and contribution of process modeling could be addressed more by paying attention on aspects being external to the intrinsic features of modeling grammars.
机译:长期以来,流程建模已成为会计信息系统(AIS)保证,分析和设计实践中的一项基本技能。结果,许多会计课程已要求将过程建模语言和技能引入并教授给未来的系统分析师会计学生。这项研究的目的是从经验上寻找是否可以使用用户容易理解的合适的业务流程模型。此外,本研究力求从自身的潜在贡献,其结果可以作为会计课程中面向信息系统的学科教学的输入。为了实现该目标,在UML 2.0活动图和BPMN语法之间进行了比较,以寻求将来可能采用的更好,更易于理解的流程建模语言。同时,较早的假设是BMPN,它在更宽的符号编号上具有优势,结果表明,尽管结果仅显示出细微的差别,但与BPMN相比,用户更容易理解UML 2.0活动图。我们的发现表明,通过关注建模语法的内在特征以外的方面,可以更好地解决过程建模的更好的教学和贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号