首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >LEGAL APPROACH TO THE EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE ASTEROID BY THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL SECTOR: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CHINA
【24h】

LEGAL APPROACH TO THE EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE ASTEROID BY THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL SECTOR: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CHINA

机译:非政府部门开发类固醇自然资源的法律途径:来自中国的分析

获取原文

摘要

The new passed "Space Act of 2015" of the United States allows US citizens to engage in the commercial exploration and exploitation of "space resources", with examples including water and minerals. Some believe that this regulation is potential to in breach of the the requirement of non-appropriation of outer space proposed by the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (Art. II OST). to which the United States is a signatory. Since space commercialization and privatization arc rapid developed in space faring countries, if the model of adopting national space legislation to authorize citizens to exploit space resources is accepted by the other space powers, it will become the competition of the space powers in exploiting space resources, and more serious legal conflicts will be caused not only to Art. II, but also to Art. I of the OST, which stipulates that "the exploration and use of outer space [...] shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries". Based on the arguments above, this study emphasize the following issues: Firstly, Art. II OST only mentions that outer space (including the moon and other celestial bodies) is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means. Whether the activity of exploiting resources in outer space by citizens constitutes the situation of claiming sovereignty is still controversial. The first part will clarify this issue. Secondly, the failure of the 1979 Moon Agreement marks the end the the "space treaty epoch", thereafter, the resolutions adopted by the United Nations General Assembly start to be the main form for regulating activities in space. For the second part, the legal approach to the exploration of space resources by the non-governmental sector will be discussed in the context of international space law. Thirdly, as a space power as well as a developing country, China is recommended to establish domestic legal regime of space resources exploration to protect national benefits in outer space, meanwhile, China is also recommended to be a participant of creating international legal mechanisms for space resources exploitation against the background of the New International Economic Order. Specifics will be illustrated in the third part.
机译:美国新通过的《 2015年太空法》允许美国公民从事“太空资源”的商业勘探和开发,例如水和矿产。一些人认为,该规定有可能违反1967年《外层空间条约》(OST第II条)提出的不占用外层空间的要求。美国是签署国。由于航天大国迅速发展了太空商业化和私有化,如果其他太空大国接受采用国家太空立法授权公民开发太空资源的模式,那么它将成为太空大国在开发太空资源方面的竞争,而且不仅会给艺术带来更严重的法律冲突。二,还要艺术。 OST第一章规定:“应当为所有国家的利益和利益进行探索和利用外层空间”。daccess-ods.un.org daccess-ods.un.org基于上述论点,本研究着重于以下问题:第一,艺术。 II OST仅提及外层空间(包括月球和其他天体)不受主权,使用或占领或任何其他方式的国家拨款。公民利用外层空间资源的活动是否构成主张主权的情况仍存在争议。第一部分将阐明此问题。其次,1979年《月球协定》的失败标志着“空间条约时代”的结束,此后,联合国大会通过的决议开始成为规范空间活动的主要形式。第二部分,将在国际空间法的背景下讨论非政府部门探索空间资源的法律方法。第三,作为航天大国和发展中国家,建议中国建立空间资源勘探的国内法律制度,以保护国家在外层空间的利益,同时,建议中国参与建立国际空间法律机制新国际经济秩序背景下的资源开发。具体细节将在第三部分中说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号