首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >LEGAL APPROACH TO THE EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE ASTEROID BY THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL SECTOR: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CHINA
【24h】

LEGAL APPROACH TO THE EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE ASTEROID BY THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL SECTOR: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CHINA

机译:非政府部门对小行星自然资源开采的法律途径:中国观点分析

获取原文

摘要

The new passed "Space Act of 2015" of the United States allows US citizens to engage in the commercial exploration and exploitation of "space resources", with examples including water and minerals. Some believe that this regulation is potential to in breach of the the requirement of non-appropriation of outer space proposed by the 1967 Outer Space Treaty (Art. II OST). to which the United States is a signatory. Since space commercialization and privatization arc rapid developed in space faring countries, if the model of adopting national space legislation to authorize citizens to exploit space resources is accepted by the other space powers, it will become the competition of the space powers in exploiting space resources, and more serious legal conflicts will be caused not only to Art. II, but also to Art. I of the OST, which stipulates that "the exploration and use of outer space [...] shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries". Based on the arguments above, this study emphasize the following issues: Firstly, Art. II OST only mentions that outer space (including the moon and other celestial bodies) is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means. Whether the activity of exploiting resources in outer space by citizens constitutes the situation of claiming sovereignty is still controversial. The first part will clarify this issue. Secondly, the failure of the 1979 Moon Agreement marks the end the the "space treaty epoch", thereafter, the resolutions adopted by the United Nations General Assembly start to be the main form for regulating activities in space. For the second part, the legal approach to the exploration of space resources by the non-governmental sector will be discussed in the context of international space law. Thirdly, as a space power as well as a developing country, China is recommended to establish domestic legal regime of space resources exploration to protect national benefits in outer space, meanwhile, China is also recommended to be a participant of creating international legal mechanisms for space resources exploitation against the background of the New International Economic Order. Specifics will be illustrated in the third part.
机译:通过美国的“2015太空行动”新允许美国公民参与的“空间资源”的商业勘探和开采,实例包括水和矿物质。有些人认为,这个条例的潜力违反的由1967年的外空条约提出的外空非拨款的要求(第II OST)。到美国是签署。由于空间商业化和私有化弧迅速在空间航天的国家制定,如果采用国家空间立法授权公民利用空间资源的模型是由其他航天大国接受,这将成为航天大国的竞争中开发空间资源,更严重的法律冲突,不仅有利于艺术所致。 II,也给艺术。我的OST,其中规定的“探索和利用外层空间[...]应为造福于所有国家的利益而进行的”。基于以上的观点,这项研究强调了以下问题:首先,艺术。 II OST只提到了外空间(包括月亮和其他天体)不受到国家拨款通过主权要求,使用或占领的手段,或者通过任何其它手段。无论是公民在外太空开发资源的活动构成了宣示主权的情况仍然存在争议。第一部分将澄清这个问题。其次,1979年月球协定标志的失败结束了“太空条约时代”,此后,由联大通过的决议开始是在间隔限制活动的主要形式。对于第二部分,对空间资源的由非政府部门探索的法律方法将在国际空间法的背景下讨论。第三,作为一个航天大国,以及作为一个发展中国家,中国建议建立太空资源勘查的国内法律制度,以保护在外层空间国家利益,同时,中国还建议将创造空国际法律机制的参与者资源开发对国际经济新秩序的背景。细节将在第三部分进行说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号