【24h】

ON THE COMPARISON BETWEEN DISPLACEMENT MODAL TESTING AND STRAIN MODAL TESTING

机译:位移模态测试与应变模态测试的比较

获取原文

摘要

The conventional modal testing, hereafter referred as Displacement Modal Testing (DMT) is based on measurement of displacement, velocity or acceleration as well as excitation force. An enormous literature regards the DMT, on the contrary, a few papers address modal testing based on strain gauges or strain sensor, hereafter referred as Strain Modal Testing (SMT). The main reason of this scenario is due to practical problems in the use of strain gauges as calibration procedure, ground loop, sensitivity not adequate at high frequency, bonding quality. In this work, a novel piezoelectric strain sensor is used for SMT. It is demonstrated in the present work that this sensor overcomes the practical drawbacks related to the use of strain gauges. Thus, SMT based on piezoelectric strain sensors can be a valid alternative to DMT, usually based on accelerometers. Comparisons between the modal testing results concerning brackets with different constraint conditions using both accelerometers and strain sensors are given in terms of modal parameters, highlighting their pros and cons.
机译:常规模态测试(以下称为位移模态测试(DMT))基于位移,速度或加速度以及激励力的测量。相反,关于DMT的文献很多,相反,有几篇论文介绍了基于应变仪或应变传感器的模态测试,以下称为应变模态测试(SMT)。这种情况的主要原因是由于在使用应变计作为校准程序,接地回路,高频下的灵敏度不足,键合质量方面存在实际问题。在这项工作中,新型的压电应变传感器用于SMT。在本工作中证明该传感器克服了与使用应变仪有关的实际缺陷。因此,通常基于加速度计的基于压电应变传感器的SMT可以替代DMT,是一种有效的选择。通过模态参数比较了使用加速度计和应变传感器对具有不同约束条件的支架进行的模态测试结果之间的比较,突出了它们的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号