首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >General rules for a unified Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools
【24h】

General rules for a unified Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools

机译:符合用于控制条带工具的新的全球统一制度(GHS)的统一危险带条的一般规则

获取原文

摘要

Many control banding tools use hazard banding in risk assessments for the classification of hazards arising from occupational handling of hazardous substances. Hazard bands can be assigned using the hazard communication elements from the label or the safety data sheet (SDS) of chemical products. The Globally Harmonised System (GHS) has resulted in a change in the hazard communication elements, i.e. hazard (H) statements instead of risk-phrases. In addition to the new H statements, GHS leads also to changes in the dilution rules for the classification of mixtures. Due to this fact hazard banding schemes that depend on the old form of safety information have to be adapted to the new legislation. The simple translation from R-phrases to H statements is problematic and not always possible. Therefore general rules for the assignment of hazards to hazard bands are proposed. As basis for the assignment of hazard bands, the H statements and the dilution rules from GHS are used. All H statements were assigned to six hazard bands with respect to the severity of the underlying hazard. These hazard bands range from n.a. = "not applicable" for e. g. highly self-diluted products or non-health related statements through A = "low hazard", B = "moderate hazard", C = "high hazard" and D = "very high hazard" to E = "extremely high hazard". To support the important principle of substitution, the last one is reserved for proven carcinogens or mutagens, while all less severe hazards are assigned at worst to hazard band D. Hazard bands are assigned specifically to the route of exposure concerned in the respective H statement. This enables the user to adjust risk management measures to the specific uptake route. The rules for assigning hazard bands with respect to the severity of the hazard to , encourage substitution and the exposure route are in line with the requirements for qualitative risk characterisation described e.g. in the REACH guidance. The SDS of the products as source of the required hazard information and the GHS regulation as basis for the assignment of hazard bands ensures that the new hazard banding is in conformity with the new legislation on classification and labelling of chemicals. This presentation will demonstrate that the implementation of this GHS hazard banding in various control banding tools can result in a unified classification of health hazards from the handling of hazardous substances.
机译:许多控制分类工具在风险评估中使用危害分类,以对由职业性处理有害物质引起的危害进行分类。可以使用化学产品标签或安全数据表(SDS)中的危害传达元素来分配危害等级。全球统一制度(GHS)导致了危害沟通要素即危害(H)声明而不是风险措辞的改变。除了新的H声明外,GHS还导致混合物分类的稀释规则发生变化。因此,依赖于旧形式安全信息的危险等级划分方案必须适应新法规。从R短语到H语句的简单翻译是有问题的,而且并非总是可能的。因此,提出了将危险分配给危险范围的一般规则。作为危险带分配的基础,使用了H声明和GHS的稀释规则。就潜在危害的严重程度而言,所有H陈述均被划分为六个危害等级。这些危险范围为n.a. =“不适用于”。 G。高度自我稀释的产品或与健康无关的陈述,通过A =“低危害”,B =“中度危害”,C =“高危害”和D =“极高危害”到E =“极高危害”。为了支持重要的替代原理,最后一个保留给已证实的致癌物或诱变剂,而所有较不严重的危害则在最坏的情况下分配给危险范围D。在相应的H声明中,危险范围专门分配给了相关的暴露途径。这使用户可以将风险管理措施调整为特定的吸收途径。根据危害的严重性划分危险等级的规则,鼓励替代和暴露途径与描述的定性风险特征要求相一致,例如在REACH指南中。产品的安全数据单(SDS)可作为所需危险信息的来源,而GHS法规可作为危险带分配的基础,可确保新的危险带符合有关化学品分类和标签的新法规。本演讲将证明,在各种控制分类工具中实施此GHS危险分类可从处理危险物质中对健康危害进行统一分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号