首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >General rules for a unified Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools
【24h】

General rules for a unified Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools

机译:统一危害绑带的一般规则,符合新的全球统一系统(GHS),用于控制绑带工具

获取原文

摘要

Many control banding tools use hazard banding in risk assessments for the classification of hazards arising from occupational handling of hazardous substances. Hazard bands can be assigned using the hazard communication elements from the label or the safety data sheet (SDS) of chemical products. The Globally Harmonised System (GHS) has resulted in a change in the hazard communication elements, i.e. hazard (H) statements instead of risk-phrases. In addition to the new H statements, GHS leads also to changes in the dilution rules for the classification of mixtures. Due to this fact hazard banding schemes that depend on the old form of safety information have to be adapted to the new legislation. The simple translation from R-phrases to H statements is problematic and not always possible. Therefore general rules for the assignment of hazards to hazard bands are proposed. As basis for the assignment of hazard bands, the H statements and the dilution rules from GHS are used. All H statements were assigned to six hazard bands with respect to the severity of the underlying hazard. These hazard bands range from n.a. = "not applicable" for e. g. highly self-diluted products or non-health related statements through A = "low hazard", B = "moderate hazard", C = "high hazard" and D = "very high hazard" to E = "extremely high hazard". To support the important principle of substitution, the last one is reserved for proven carcinogens or mutagens, while all less severe hazards are assigned at worst to hazard band D. Hazard bands are assigned specifically to the route of exposure concerned in the respective H statement. This enables the user to adjust risk management measures to the specific uptake route. The rules for assigning hazard bands with respect to the severity of the hazard to , encourage substitution and the exposure route are in line with the requirements for qualitative risk characterisation described e.g. in the REACH guidance. The SDS of the products as source of the required hazard information and the GHS regulation as basis for the assignment of hazard bands ensures that the new hazard banding is in conformity with the new legislation on classification and labelling of chemicals. This presentation will demonstrate that the implementation of this GHS hazard banding in various control banding tools can result in a unified classification of health hazards from the handling of hazardous substances.
机译:许多控制绑带工具在风险评估中使用风险评估中的危险条件,以分类有害物质的危害所产生的危害。可以使用来自化学产品的标签或安全数据表(SDS)的危险通信元件来分配危险带。全球协调的系统(GHS)导致危险通信元素的变化,即危险(H)陈述而不是风险短语。除了新的H陈述外,GHS还领导了混合物分类的稀释规则的变化。由于这一事实,遵守旧形式的安全信息的危险条件计划必须适应新的立法。 R-Placlase对H语句的简单翻译是有问题的,并不总是可能的。因此,提出了向危险条件分配危害的一般规则。作为分配危险条件的基础,使用H陈述和GHS的稀释规则。所有H陈述都被分配到六个危险条带,了解潜在危险的严重程度。这些危险带的范围从N.A. = E的“不适用”。 G。通过A =“低危险”,B =“中等危险”,C =“高危险”和D =“非常高的危险”,对E =“极高的危险”的非健康相关的陈述。为了支持替代的重要原则,最后一个致癌致癌或致致诱导症保留,而所有严重的危害都在最差的危险带D.危险条件专门针对各自的H声明中的曝光途径分配。这使用户能够将风险管理措施调整到特定的摄取路线。用于分配危险条件关于危险的严重程度,鼓励替代和曝光路线的规则符合例如描述的定性风险特征的要求。在达人范围内。产品的SDS作为所需的危险信息和GHS调节的源作为危险乐队的转让的基础确保了新的危险条件符合化学品分类和标签的新立法。本演示文献将证明,各种控制绑扎工具中的GHS危险条带的实施可能导致从处理有害物质的健康危害的统一分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号