首页> 外文会议>International Forum on Strategic Technology >Comparative evaluation of the sand blasting, acid etching and electron beam surface treatments of titanium for medical application
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of the sand blasting, acid etching and electron beam surface treatments of titanium for medical application

机译:医用钛的喷砂,酸蚀和电子束表面处理的比较评价

获取原文

摘要

Modification of the surface topography and chemistry are commonly used to achieve the desired biological response to the implants. The influence of the different treatment methods on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of titanium is reported. All samples were divided into 2 groups. First group was sandblasted with 250-320 μm Al2O3 at two pressures 0.45 MPa and 0.61 MPa followed by the chemical etching in a fluorine-containing solution. The second group was acid-etched in the same solution followed by electron beam modification with the energy density 8 J/cm2. The samples were investigated by SEM, EDX, XRD, nanoindentation and sessile drop method. The studies revealed that all groups have nano/micro-patterned surfaces. The EDX analysis detected only titanium in all groups. The XRD results revealed the presence of diffraction peaks corresponding to titanium. The nanoindentation studies revealed significant differences in the mechanical properties between group 1 and 2. The elastic strain to failure and plastic deformation resistance of the group 2 were determined to be 0.035 and 5*10-3, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of group 1. The obtained results of water contact angle for group 1 revealed moderately hydrophilic properties of treated surfaces. The water contact angle was increased up to 80.85 ± 8.3 ° for group 2.
机译:通常使用表面形貌和化学的修饰来实现对植入物的所需生物学反应。报道了不同处理方法对钛的物理化学和机械性能的影响。将所有样品分成两组。第一组用250-320μm的Al2O3在0.45 MPa和0.61 MPa的两个压力下喷砂,然后在含氟溶液中进行化学蚀刻。第二组在相同溶液中被酸蚀,然后以8 J / cm2的能量密度进行电子束修饰。通过SEM,EDX,XRD,纳米压痕和固着滴法对样品进行了研究。研究表明,所有组均具有纳米/微米图案的表面。 EDX分析在所有组中仅检测到钛。 XRD结果表明存在对应于钛的衍射峰。纳米压痕研究表明,第1组和第2组之间的机械性能存在显着差异。第2组的断裂弹性应变和抗塑性变形性分别确定为0.035和5 * 10-3,这明显高于第2组。第一组的水接触角的结果表明,处理过的表面具有中等亲水性。第2组的水接触角增加到80.85±8.3°。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号