首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >Effects of Alarm Modality and Alarm Reliability on Workload, Trust, and DrivingPerformance
【24h】

Effects of Alarm Modality and Alarm Reliability on Workload, Trust, and DrivingPerformance

机译:警报方式和警报可靠性对工作量,信任和驾驶的影响性能

获取原文

摘要

As roads are getting more congested, the rate of automobile crashes due to driver error is also rising. Driving is an attentiondemanding task. The automobile industry has developed collision avoidance warning systems to increase situation awareness androadway safety. Different modalities of alarms could be used to increase drivers’ situation awareness. The current study is apreliminary analysis of the effects of alarm reliability (70% & 90%) and alarm modality (auditory & tactile) on driver performance,trust in alarms, and perceived workload. Participants (n=5) drove in a simulated environment. The results showed that drivers hadfewer collisions in the tactile condition than the auditory condition. The findings of this research can inform which alarm modality iseffective in improving driver performance and how practitioners can use this information to improve collision avoidance warningsystems to increase roadway safety.
机译:随着道路变得越来越拥挤,由于驾驶员失误导致的汽车撞车率也在上升。开车是一个注意 艰巨的任务。汽车工业已经开发了防撞预警系统,以提高态势感知和 道路安全。可以使用不同的警报方式来提高驾驶员的状况意识。目前的研究是 初步分析警报可靠性(70%和90%)和警报方式(听觉和触觉)对驾驶员性能的影响, 信任警报和可感知的工作量。参与者(n = 5)在模拟环境中开车。结果显示,驾驶员 触觉状态下的碰撞比听觉状态下的碰撞少。这项研究的发现可以告知哪种报警方式是 有效提高驾驶员性能以及从业者如何使用此信息来改善避免撞车警告 系统以提高道路安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号