首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics >Simplicity or flexibility? Complementary Filter vs. EKF for orientation estimation on mobile devices
【24h】

Simplicity or flexibility? Complementary Filter vs. EKF for orientation estimation on mobile devices

机译:简单或灵活性?互补滤波器与EKF用于移动设备上的方向估计

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Contemporary mobile devices can be used as navigation aids. The embedded gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer used together may form a reliable AHRS (Attitude and Heading Reference System), which estimates the orientation of the device with respect to the global reference frame. However, a question arises: which framework to use in order to integrate the noisy data under the tight computing power and energy limitations of a mobile device? While the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is considered the standard framework to solve estimation problems in navigation, in practice the much simpler Complementary Filter is often applied in systems of limited resources. In this paper we compare the strengths and drawbacks of both frameworks in the application context of Android-based mobile devices. The comparison is focused on the assessment of accuracy and reliability in several real-world motion scenarios.
机译:现代风格移动设备可用作导航辅助工具。嵌入式陀螺仪,加速度计和磁力计一起使用,可以形成可靠的AHRS(姿态和标题参考系统),其估计设备相对于全局参考帧的方向。但是,出现了一个问题:要使用的框架,以便在移动设备的紧密计算功率和能量限制下集成嘈杂数据?虽然扩展的卡尔曼滤波器(EKF)被认为是解决导航中估计问题的标准框架,但在实践中,在有限资源的系统中通常应用更简单的互补滤波器。在本文中,我们可以比较基于Android的移动设备的应用程序背景下的框架的优势和缺点。比较专注于在几个真实运动场景中评估准确性和可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号