首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the transportation research board;Transportation Research Board >HYBRID CHOICE MODELLING ALLOWING FOR REFERENCE-DEPENDENT PREFERENCES: ESTIMATION AND VALIDATION FOR THE CASE OF ALTERNATIVE-FUEL VEHICLES
【24h】

HYBRID CHOICE MODELLING ALLOWING FOR REFERENCE-DEPENDENT PREFERENCES: ESTIMATION AND VALIDATION FOR THE CASE OF ALTERNATIVE-FUEL VEHICLES

机译:参照偏好的混合选择模型:替代燃料汽车的估计和验证

获取原文

摘要

The recent literature has shown an increasing interest in modelling behaviours that depart from the standard model of rational choice, as typically used in discrete choice models. While these behavioural aspects may be present at the same time in a choice context, most research has studied only one effect at a time. The risk in studying these behavioural aspects separately is that their effects can be confounded or overstated. In this paper we focus on two of the most popular behavioural extensions of the classical choice framework: preference heterogeneity related to attitudes and reference-dependent preferences. We investigate how the two phenomena interact in a combined framework. We test our hybrid choice model that allows for reference-dependent preferences on a data set with choices among alternative-fuel vehicles. The models are validated using a large hold-out sample. Our results show that both effects are important to explain heterogeneity in choice behaviour and that they are not confounded in our application. Latent variables and eference-dependent preferences appear to explain different dimensions of choice.
机译:最近的文献表明,人们对建模行为的兴趣日益浓厚 从理性选择的标准模型(通常用于离散选择模型)中得出。尽管 这些行为方面可能在选择的背景下同时出现,大多数研究 一次只研究一种效果。研究这些行为方面的风险 它们的影响可能被混淆或被夸大了。在本文中,我们重点讨论两个 选择框架中最受欢迎的行为扩展:偏好 与态度和依从偏好有关的异质性。我们调查如何 这两种现象在一个组合的框架中相互作用。我们测试了混合选择模型 允许在数据集上选择与参考有关的偏好,并在替代燃料中进行选择 汽车。使用大量保留样本对模型进行了验证。我们的结果表明 效应对于解释选择行为的异质性很重要,而并非如此 混淆了我们的应用程序。出现潜在变量和依赖于参考的偏好 解释选择的不同维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号