首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >Developing a Scoring Matrix to Evaluate the Usability of Consumer Packaging: A Pilot Study
【24h】

Developing a Scoring Matrix to Evaluate the Usability of Consumer Packaging: A Pilot Study

机译:开发评分矩阵以评估消费者包装的可用性:一项初步研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The goal of the current study was to test a scoring matrix for evaluating and quantifying the difficulty ofuse of consumer packaging for an older adult population. Scores range from 0 to 100; the lower the score,the less usable the packaging design. Twelve older adults (9 females, 3 males; M_(age) = 69.5) completed anonline survey in which they evaluated 15 everyday packaging types on frequency of use and difficulty ofthe functional tasks required for use (e.g., pick up and carry, remove seal, open, dispense, close). Blisterpackaging scored the lowest (M = 71.5) and could benefit the most from redesign. Microwave mealpackaging scored the highest (M = 85.8), but this was the only score computed without all participants;only five participants reported using microwave meals. Pull tab cans scored second highest with a meanscore of 84.2. In this pilot study, we are laying the groundwork for creating a tool to systematically evaluateand quantify the usability of all packaging types.
机译:当前研究的目标是测试一个评分矩阵,以评估和量化评分的难度 老年人使用消费包装。分数范围从0到100;分数越低, 包装设计的实用性越差。 12名老年人(9名女性,3名男性; M_(年龄)= 69.5)完成了一项 在线调查中,他们评估了15种日常包装类型的使用频率和使用难度 使用所需的功能性任务(例如,拿起并携带,取下密封件,打开,分配,关闭)。水疱 包装得分最低(M = 71.5),并且可以从重新设计中受益最大。微波炉餐 包装得分最高(M = 85.8),但这是在没有所有参与者的情况下唯一计算出的得分; 只有五名参与者报告使用微波餐。拉片罐平均得分第二高 得分84.2。在这项初步研究中,我们为创建系统评估工具奠定了基础 并量化所有包装类型的可用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号