首页> 外文会议>Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society >A Comparative Study of Recording Procedures for Motor Evoked Potential Signals
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Recording Procedures for Motor Evoked Potential Signals

机译:电动机诱发潜在信号记录程序的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Motor evoked potential (MEP) signals serve as an objective measure of the functional integrity of motor pathways in the spinal cord. Hence, they provide a reliable assessment of the extent of spinal cord injury (SCI). There are two methods currently being used for serial MEP recordings in rats: a low-frequency and a high-frequency method. In this paper, we compared the two methods and determined the better method for MEP recordings. We also compared the effect of two anesthetic agents - inhalational isoflurane and intraperitoneal ketamine - on the MEP signals. We found that under ketamine anesthesia, low-frequency stimulation led to more consistent results, while high-frequency stimulation required greater stimulation intensity and was prone to unwanted side-effects including excessive head twitches. We further found that isoflurane anesthesia severely depressed the MEP response for both low-frequency and high-frequency stimulation which rendered the resulting signal unusable.
机译:电动机诱发电位(MEP)信号作为脊髓中电机途径功能完整性的客观测量。因此,它们提供对脊髓损伤程度(SCI)的可靠评估。目前有两种方法用于大鼠的串行MEP录制:低频和高频方法。在本文中,我们比较了两种方法并确定了MEP录制的更好方法。我们还比较了两种麻醉剂 - 吸入异氟烷和腹膜内氯胺酮 - 对MEP信号的影响。我们发现在氯胺酮麻醉下,低频刺激导致结果更加一致,而高频刺激需要更大的刺激强度,并且容易受到不需要的副作用,包括过度的侧抽搐。我们进一步发现异氟醚麻醉严重抑制了低频和高频刺激的MEP响应,这使得所得到的信号无法使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号