首页> 外文会议>IEEE conference on computer communications >Open peering by Internet transit providers: Peer preference or peer pressure?
【24h】

Open peering by Internet transit providers: Peer preference or peer pressure?

机译:互联网传输提供商的开放式对等:同行偏好还是同行压力?

获取原文

摘要

Peering agreements between Autonomous Systems affect not only the flow of interdomain traffic but also the economics of the entire Internet ecosystem. The conventional wisdom is that transit providers are selective in choosing their settlement-free peers because they prefer to offer revenue-generating transit service to others. Surprisingly, however, a large percentage of transit providers use an Open peering strategy. What causes this large-scale adoption of Open peering, especially among transit providers? More importantly, what is the impact of this peering trend on the economic performance of the population of transit providers? We approach these questions through game-theoretic modeling and agent-based simulations, capturing the dynamics of peering strategy adoption, inter-network formation and interdomain traffic flow. We explain why transit providers gravitate towards Open peering even though that move may be detrimental to their economic fitness. Finally, we examine the impact of an Open peering variant that requires some coordination among providers.
机译:自治系统之间的对等协议不仅影响域间流量的流向,而且还影响整个Internet生态系统的经济性。传统的观点是,公交提供商选择其免结算的同行是有选择的,因为他们更愿意向其他人提供创收的公交服务。但是,令人惊讶的是,大量的传输提供商使用开放对等策略。是什么导致大规模采用开放对等网络,尤其是在传输提供商中?更重要的是,这种对等趋势对过境服务提供者人口的经济表现有什么影响?我们通过博弈论模型和基于代理的仿真来解决这些问题,捕获对等策略采用,网络间形成和域间流量的动态变化。我们解释了为什么运输服务提供商偏向于开放式对等网络,即使此举可能不利于他们的经济适应性。最后,我们研究了开放对等变体的影响,该变体需要提供商之间进行一些协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号