首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >Health of Cattle and Wildlife Downwind from Gas Faeilities: The Western Canada Study
【24h】

Health of Cattle and Wildlife Downwind from Gas Faeilities: The Western Canada Study

机译:牛气化对牛和野生动物健康的影响:加拿大西部研究

获取原文

摘要

Conflict over land use between natural gas development and cattle ranching became acute in western Canada until in 2000 the Western Canada Study was organized to investigate allegations of health effects. There were two important goals: 1) to determine if emissions downwind from oil and gas facilities influence the reproduction and health of cattle and wildlife in western Canada and 2) to provide new and economically useful information for cow-calf producers on factors affecting herd productivity and herd health. An arm's-length management agency was set up to support and oversee the study, with multiple stakeholders involved. The principal investigator for the Study was Dr. Cheryl Waldner, veterinary epidemiologist at the University of Saskatchewan. The author chaired the Scientific Advisory Pane, which took an active role in study design and provided oversight. An arm of the Study devoted to human health was terminated before it began, ostensibly as a budgetary recission but probably for political reasons.A tandem wildlife study was implemented using European starlings as an indicator species. The overall pattern of findings demonstrated no adverse effect of downwind exposure on animal health, although the Study found some associations that suggested possible effects at levels of SO2 much lower than expected . Air quality in field locations compared favorably with other rural and with urban centers. Important design features of this Study included the innovative management structure, a secondary goal of improving herd management, a hypothesis-driven study protocol, and the unusually active role of science advisors. Emphasis in this presentation is on the study design, exposure assessment methodology and project management. The innovations and practices of this Study, and in particular the management organization of WISSA, could be a useful model for conducting studies in the context of similarly contentious issues, such as "tight" (shale) oil and gas recovery using fracking.
机译:在加拿大西部,天然气开发与牲畜饲养之间的土地使用冲突变得更加尖锐,直到2000年组织了“加拿大西部研究”以调查对健康影响的指控。有两个重要目标:1)确定石油和天然气设施的顺风排放是否影响加拿大西部牛和野生动植物的繁殖和健康,以及2)为牛犊生产者提供有关影响牛群生产力的新的和经济上有用的信息和畜群健康。建立了独立的管理机构,以支持和监督这项研究,其中涉及多个利益相关者。这项研究的主要研究人员是萨斯喀彻温大学的兽医流行病学家Cheryl Waldner博士。作者担任科学咨询窗格的主席,该窗格在研究设计中发挥了积极作用并提供了监督。这项研究专门用于人类健康的部门在开始之前就被终止了,表面上是出于预算限制,但可能出于政治原因。一项以欧洲wildlife鸟为指示物种的野生动植物串联研究得以实施。研究的总体模式表明,顺风暴露对动物健康没有不利影响,尽管该研究发现一些协会表明,二氧化硫水平下的可能影响远低于预期。与其他农村地区和城市中心相比,野外地点的空气质量优越。该研究的重要设计特征包括创新的管理结构,改善畜群管理的次要目标,假设驱动的研究方案以及科学顾问的异常活跃作用。本演讲的重点是研究设计,暴露评估方法和项目管理。这项研究的创新和实践,特别是WISSA的管理组织,可能是在类似争议性问题(例如使用压裂法开采“致密”(页岩)油气)中进行研究的有用模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号