首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >The IVAIRE Project - Ventilation Characteristics of Single Family Homes of Asthmatic Children Followed in an Asthma Clinic
【24h】

The IVAIRE Project - Ventilation Characteristics of Single Family Homes of Asthmatic Children Followed in an Asthma Clinic

机译:哮喘诊所的哮喘儿童单一家庭住宅的Ivaire项目 - 通风特征伴随着哮喘诊所

获取原文

摘要

Background and Aims The IVAIRE study evaluated the impact of improved residential ventilation on IAQ and the frequency of asthma symptoms in children. This paper describes the pre-intervention phase of this study where the ventilation characteristics of the single family homes were analyzed in order to select the homes participating in the ventilation intervention. Methods Between October 2008 and June 2010, 111 children were selected and their homes were visited three times by trained technicians during the heating-season (fall and winter) and summer. During these visits the ventilation rates were measured and the mechanical ventilation system (MVS) and their use were characterized. The measured ventilation parameters were the air changes per hour (ACH) measured with PFT gas, the building airtightness (ACH50) with a blower door, CO2, and relative humidity (RH). Ventilation parameters were compared according to the presence/absence and the type of MVS. Results A MVS was present in 73 of the 111 homes, of which 44 were heat recovery ventilators (HRV) and 29 had mixing boxes. There was no difference in ACH between the homes with (0.22) or without (0.20) a MVS (p=0.53). However, the ACH50 was lower in the homes with a MVS than without (3.1 vs. 4.8, p=<0.0001) as well as RH (37.6 vs. 42.3%, p=0.0009). Moreover the homes with an HRV had a higher ACH (0.25 vs. 0.18, p=0.003) and a lower RH (35.8 vs. 40.4%, p=0.002) than the homes with a mixing box. Conclusions Even though in the homes with a MVS an HRV seems to be more effective than a mixing box, the ACH remained lower than the ASHRAE recommended guideline of 0.35 h-1. This indicates that the presence of a MVS alone may not guarantee adequate ventilation. Factors such as the capacity of the ventilation unit, proper installation and utilization by occupants need to be investigated to design specific corrective interventions tailored to each home.
机译:背景和目标IVAIRE研究评估了改善住宅通风对儿童哮喘症状的频率的影响。本文介绍了本研究的前介入阶段,其中分析了单家族家庭的通风特性,以便选择参与通风干预的家庭。方法2008年10月至2010年6月,选择了111名儿童,在供暖季节(秋冬)和夏季,训练有素的技术人员被训练有素的技术人员访问了他们的家园。在这些访问期间,测量通风率,并表征了机械通风系统(MV)及其使用。测量的通风参数是用PFT气体测量的每小时(ACH)的空气变化,具有鼓风机门,CO2和相对湿度(RH)的建筑气密(ACH50)。根据存在/不存在和MV的存在和类型进行比较通风参数。结果在111个宿舍的73中存在MV,其中44个是热回收呼吸机(HRV),29个具有混合箱。与(0.22)或没有(0.20)MV(p = 0.53)之间的宿舍之间没有差异。然而,ACH50在宿舍中较低而不是没有(3.1与4.8,P = <0.0001)以及RH(37.6 vs.2.3%,P = 0.0009)。此外,具有HRV的宿舍具有更高的ACH(0.25 vs.018,P = 0.003),低RH(35.8与40.4%,p = 0.002),而不是搅拌箱的家庭。结论即使在具有MVS的家庭中,HRV似乎比混合箱更有效,ACH仍然低于ASHRAE推荐的0.35 H-1指南。这表明单独的MV的存在可能无法保证适当的通风。需要调查诸如通风单元的容量,适当安装和利用的容量,以设计针对每个家庭量身定制的特定纠正干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号