首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >The Impact of Source Contribution Uncertainty on the Effect of Source-Specific PM2.5 on Cardiovascular Hospital Admissions
【24h】

The Impact of Source Contribution Uncertainty on the Effect of Source-Specific PM2.5 on Cardiovascular Hospital Admissions

机译:源贡献不确定性对源特定PM2.5对心血管医院招生影响的影响

获取原文

摘要

Background and aims: Numerous studies have linked particulate sources to a range of health outcomes. They, however, do not account for the uncertainty in the prediction of the source contributions in the health models. Our goal was to estimate the effect of particulate sources on cardiovascular (CVD) health, accounting for the uncertainty in source identification. Methods: We examined the effects of PM2.5 sources on emergency CVD hospital admissions among Medicare enrollees in Boston, MA (2003-2010) using case-crossover analyses. We identified these sources using two methods. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and Absolute Principal Components Analysis (APCA). We propagated uncertainty in the prediction of source contributions employing a block bootstrap procedure. We further estimated average effect estimates across-methods for each source type using the bootstrap samples. Results: We identified six factors: regional, mobile and crustal sources, residual oil combustion, road dust and sea salt. Accounting for uncertainty, same day exposures to regional sources were associated with a 2.01% (0.21, 3.69%) and 1.96% (-0.07, 4.19%) increase in the odds of CVD admissions for PMF and APCA, respectively. Weekly exposures to residual oil combustion were associated with a 2.20% (0.25, 4.30%) and 2.04% (0.08, 4.15%) increase in odds of admissions for PMF and APCA, respectively. Same day and 2-d exposures to traffic-related PM2.5 were also associated with increased CVD admissions. Confidence intervals were wider than would have been if the uncertainty in contribution predictions had not been considered. Further, the agreement in results for PMF and APCA was stronger across factors when uncertainty was considered in the health models. Conclusions: Accounting for uncertainty in source contributions leads to more stable effect estimates across methods and can potentially lead to fewer spurious significant associations and more consistent findings across studies.
机译:背景和目的:许多研究将微粒来源与一系列健康结果相关联。然而,他们不考虑在卫生模型中源贡献的预测中的不确定性。我们的目标是估计颗粒物源对心血管(CVD)健康的影响,核算源识别的不确定性。方法:采用病例交叉分析,研究了MA(2003-2010)在波士顿的Medicare入学率急救CVD医院录取的PM2.5来源的影响。我们使用两种方法识别出这些来源。正矩阵分解(PMF)和绝对主成分分析(APCA)。我们在采用块引导程序的源贡献预测中传播不确定性。我们使用Bootstrap样本对每个源类型的进一步估计平均效果估计。结果:我们确定了六个因素:区域,移动和地壳源,残留的油燃烧,道路尘埃和海盐。对不确定性的核算,同一天的区域来源与2.01%(0.21,3.69%)和1.96%(-0.07%)和1.96%(-0.07,4.19%)分别增加PMF和APCA的差异。每周暴露于残留的油燃烧的曝光与2.20%(0.25,4.30%)和2.04%(0.08,4.15%)分别增加PMF和APCA的备用几率。与流量相关的PM2.5相同的日子和2-D曝光也与增加的CVD录取有关。如果没有考虑贡献预测的不确定性,则置信区间越宽。此外,当在卫生模式中考虑不确定性时,PMF和APCA的结果的协议更加强劲。结论:在源贡献中核算不确定性导致跨越方法的估计更稳定,可能导致跨研究的虚假重要关联和更一致的调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号