首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Society of Exposure Science >The Impact of Source Contribution Uncertainty on the Effect of Source-Specific PM2.5 on Cardiovascular Hospital Admissions
【24h】

The Impact of Source Contribution Uncertainty on the Effect of Source-Specific PM2.5 on Cardiovascular Hospital Admissions

机译:来源不确定性对特定来源PM2.5对心血管医院入院影响的影响

获取原文

摘要

Background and aims: Numerous studies have linked particulate sources to a range of health outcomes. They, however, do not account for the uncertainty in the prediction of the source contributions in the health models. Our goal was to estimate the effect of particulate sources on cardiovascular (CVD) health, accounting for the uncertainty in source identification. Methods: We examined the effects of PM2.5 sources on emergency CVD hospital admissions among Medicare enrollees in Boston, MA (2003-2010) using case-crossover analyses. We identified these sources using two methods. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and Absolute Principal Components Analysis (APCA). We propagated uncertainty in the prediction of source contributions employing a block bootstrap procedure. We further estimated average effect estimates across-methods for each source type using the bootstrap samples. Results: We identified six factors: regional, mobile and crustal sources, residual oil combustion, road dust and sea salt. Accounting for uncertainty, same day exposures to regional sources were associated with a 2.01% (0.21, 3.69%) and 1.96% (-0.07, 4.19%) increase in the odds of CVD admissions for PMF and APCA, respectively. Weekly exposures to residual oil combustion were associated with a 2.20% (0.25, 4.30%) and 2.04% (0.08, 4.15%) increase in odds of admissions for PMF and APCA, respectively. Same day and 2-d exposures to traffic-related PM2.5 were also associated with increased CVD admissions. Confidence intervals were wider than would have been if the uncertainty in contribution predictions had not been considered. Further, the agreement in results for PMF and APCA was stronger across factors when uncertainty was considered in the health models. Conclusions: Accounting for uncertainty in source contributions leads to more stable effect estimates across methods and can potentially lead to fewer spurious significant associations and more consistent findings across studies.
机译:背景和目的:大量研究已将颗粒物来源与一系列健康结果联系在一起。但是,它们没有考虑健康模型中源贡献预测的不确定性。我们的目标是估计颗粒物来源对心血管(CVD)健康的影响,并考虑来源识别中的不确定性。方法:我们采用病例交叉分析方法,研究了马萨诸塞州波士顿市(2003-2010年)的Medicare参加者中PM2.5来源对急诊CVD住院的影响。我们使用两种方法识别了这些来源。正矩阵分解(PMF)和绝对主成分分析(APCA)。我们在采用块自举程序的源贡献预测中传播了不确定性。我们使用引导程序样本进一步估计了每种源类型的跨方法的平均效果估计。结果:我们确定了六个因素:区域,流动和地壳源,残余油燃烧,道路扬尘和海盐。考虑到不确定性,当天暴露于区域性资源的PMF和APCA的CVD住院几率分别增加2.01%(0.21,3.69%)和1.96%(-0.07,4.19%)。每周残留油燃烧的暴露分别使PMF和APCA的入场风险增加2.20%(0.25,4.30%)和2.04%(0.08,4.15%)。当天和2天与交通相关的PM2.5暴露也与CVD入院率增加有关。如果没有考虑贡献预测中的不确定性,则置信区间会更大。此外,当在健康模型中考虑不确定性时,PMF和APCA结果在各个因素上的一致性更强。结论:考虑到源贡献的不确定性,可以跨方法更稳定地评估效果,并有可能导致更少的虚假显着关联和跨研究的更一致的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号