首页> 外文会议>European conference on applications of evolutionary computation >Looking for Alternatives: Optimization of Energy Supply Systems without Superstructure
【24h】

Looking for Alternatives: Optimization of Energy Supply Systems without Superstructure

机译:寻找替代方案:优化无上层建筑的能源供应系统

获取原文

摘要

We investigate different evolutionary algorithm (EA) variants for structural optimization of energy supply systems and compare them with a deterministic optimization approach. The evolutionary algorithms enable structural optimization avoiding to use an underlying superstructure model. As result of the optimization, we are interested in multiple good alternative designs, instead of the one single best solution only. This problem has three levels: On the top level, we need to fix a structure; based on that structure, we then have to select facility sizes; finally, given the structure and equipment sizing, on the bottom level, the equipment operation has to be specified to satisfy given energy demands. In the presented optimization approach, these three levels are addressed simultaneously. We compare EAs acting on the top level (the lower levels are treated by a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) solver) against an MILP-only-approach and are highly interested in the ability of both methods to deliver multiple different solutions and the time required for performing this task. Neither state-of-the-art EA for numerical optimization nor standard measures or visualizations are applicable to the problem. This lack of experience makes it difficult to understand why different EA variants perform as they do (e.g., for stating how different two structures are), we introduce a distance concept for structures. We therefore introduce a short code, and, based on this short code, a distance measure that is employed for a multidimensional scaling (MDS) based visualization. This is meant as first step towards a better understanding of the problem landscape. The algorithm comparison shows that deterministic optimization has advantages if we need to find the global optimum. In contrast, the presented EA variants reliably find multiple solutions very quickly if the required solution accuracy is relaxed. Furthermore, the proposed distance measure enables visualization revealing interesting problem properties.
机译:我们研究了用于能源供应系统结构优化的不同进化算法(EA)变体,并将其与确定性优化方法进行了比较。进化算法使结构优化避免使用底层的上层建筑模型。作为优化的结果,我们对多个好的替代设计感兴趣,而不仅仅是一个最佳的解决方案。这个问题分为三个层次:在顶层,我们需要修复一个结构;然后,基于该结构,我们必须选择设施规模;最后,在结构和设备选型的基础上,必须指定设备操作以满足给定的能源需求。在提出的优化方法中,同时解决了这三个层次。我们将仅在最高级别(较低级别由混合整数线性规划(MILP)求解器处理)的EA与仅采用MILP的方法进行了比较,并对这两种方法提供多种不同解决方案的能力以及执行此任务所需的时间。用于数值优化的最新EA或标准方法或可视化方法均不适用于该问题。缺乏经验使我们很难理解为什么不同的EA变体会像它们那样起作用(例如,为了说明两个结构的不同程度),我们为结构引入了距离概念。因此,我们介绍了一个短代码,并基于该短代码,引入了一种基于多维缩放(MDS)的可视化的距离度量。这是迈向更好地理解问题态势的第一步。算法比较表明,确定性优化在需要找到全局最优值的情况下具有优势。相反,如果放宽了所需的解决方案精度,则所提供的EA变型可以非常快速地可靠地找到多个解决方案。此外,提出的距离度量可以实现可视化,揭示有趣的问题属性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号