首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning >Engineering Accreditation and Professional Competence in Ireland and Brazil Similarities, Differences and Convergence in a Global Context
【24h】

Engineering Accreditation and Professional Competence in Ireland and Brazil Similarities, Differences and Convergence in a Global Context

机译:在爱尔兰和巴西的工程认证和专业能力和巴西相似之处,差异和融合在全球范围内

获取原文

摘要

Context: The Brazil's 'Ciência sem Fronteiras' (CsF) initiative has led to a phenomenal number of students from universities in Brazil experiencing engineering education in different parts of the world. Ireland has been very successful on a per capita basis of attracting CsF students with over 3,443 attending typically for a full academic year in the period 2013-2015. Purpose: While there are many benefits of the CsF initiative to all stakeholders, there are some important issues that have emerged. These include the direct relevance and usefulness of the engineering education experience gained while abroad. Credits gained in Ireland through the European Credits Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) are not necessarily recognised as part of the students' home degree programme in Brazil. This paper seeks to identify why this is the case and to propose some potential actions to enhance the mutual recognition of engineering education activities. Approach: The associated accreditation of engineering undergraduate and postgraduate programmes and routes to achieving legally recognised professional competence in Ireland and Brazil require some analysis and reflection. This paper outlines the current approaches to engineering education in both countries for degree and masters programmes, i.e. Bologna Cycles 1 and 2. It includes the alternative views on 'inputs' such as the appropriate number of contact hours, and 'outputs', such as the identification and attainment of learning outcomes and competences. Outcomes: The paper provides greater clarity on the similarities and differences between engineering education programmes in the two countries. The different roles that the governments and the relevant professional registration bodies take in directing the higher education institutions' engineering education programmes are also contrasted. Conclusions: The paper concludes with recommendations to facilitate improved mutual understanding and recognition between Ireland and Brazil in the context of facilitating global professional engineering practice.
机译:背景:巴西的'CIênciaSemFronteiras'(CSF)倡议导致了来自世界各地的工程教育的大学的现象数量。爱尔兰在2013 - 2015年期间的全年学年吸引了超过3,443人的CSF学生的人均依据非常成功。目的:虽然CSF倡议对所有利益攸关方进行了许多好处,但有一些重要的问题出现了。这些包括在国外获得的工程教育经验的直接相关性和有用性。通过欧洲信贷转让和积累系统(ECTS)在爱尔兰获得的信贷不一定被认为是巴西学生家庭学位课程的一部分。本文旨在确定为什么这是案例,并提出一些潜在的行动,以提高对工程教育活动的相互承认。方法:工程本科和研究生课程和途径在爱尔兰和巴西获得合法认可的专业能力的相关认证需要一些分析和反思。本文概述了目前对学位和硕士计划的国家工程教育方法,即博洛尼亚循环1和2。它包括“输入”等替代视图,例如相应的联系时间和“输出”,例如识别和实现学习结果和能力。结果:本文对两国工程教育课程之间的相似性和差异提供了更明显的清晰度。政府和相关职业登记机构指导高等教育机构工程教育方案的不同作用也鲜明。结论:本文得出结论,建议促进爱尔兰与巴西在促进全球专业工程实践方面改善了爱尔兰和巴西的相互理解和认可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号