首页> 外文会议>International symposium on bioinformatics research and applications >Order Decay in Transcription Regulation in Type 1 Diabetes
【24h】

Order Decay in Transcription Regulation in Type 1 Diabetes

机译:1型糖尿病转录调控的顺序衰减

获取原文

摘要

In this study, using type 1 diabetes (T1D) as a model system, we investigate two outstanding challenges in the development of molecular signatures of complex traits: the incorporation of gene interaction structure in signature definition, and the integration of multiple Omics data types to refine signature. The T1D data consists of our previously published transcription profiles in control peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) induced by sera of 142 human subjects from unrelated healthy controls (uHC), and 3 T1D family cohorts: recent onset (RO-T1D), and healthy siblings of probands that are at high (HRS) or low (LRS) genetic risk for T1D. First both weighted and non-weighted co-expression networks were separately constructed in each cohort and were compared. Several network measures, including edge weight and degree distribution, Shannon's entropy, the λ-coefficient, and h-index, were determined. We found that overall the co-expression networks induced by the RO-T1D cohort are significantly weaker, exhibiting a broad spectrum loss of order and control. More specifically, all T1D family cohorts induced more active and orderly transcription coordination among the innate immunity genes, consistent with our previous report of them sharing a heightened innate inflammatory state. On the other hand, higher coordination of the adaptive immunity genes was only induced by the LRS cohort, potentially explaining their low risk for disease. All the network measures also pointed to the same story, and additionally the importance of the innate immunity genes in determining the transcriptome state of the T1D family cohorts. Next, we integrated the protein-protein interaction (PPI) and the transcriptomic co-expression networks, and focused specifically on the smallest functional units of PPI, the protein complexes (PC). A PC is considered active in a cohort, if its co-expression network is percolated. We found that the RO-T1D cohort activated a significant less number of PC than the others. Overall, whether it is co-expression or protein interaction networks, the four cohorts show striking differences and can be clearly discriminated based on network structural measures. In contrast, gene expression levels alone, without the consideration of underlying interaction networks, could barely differentiate the cohorts. In summary these findings demonstrate the advantage network based metrics in defining molecular signatures.
机译:在这项研究中,使用1型糖尿病(T1D)作为模型系统,我们研究了复杂性状分子标记开发中的两个突出挑战:将基因相互作用结构整合到标记定义中,以及将多种Omics数据类型整合到完善签名。 T1D数据包含我们先前发布的142位来自无关健康对照(uHC)和3个T1D家族队列的人的血清诱导的对照外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)的转录谱:最近发作(RO-T1D)和T1D遗传风险高(HRS)或低(LRS)的先证者的兄弟姐妹。首先,在每个队列中分别构建加权和非加权共表达网络,并进行比较。确定了几种网络度量,包括边缘权重和度分布,香农熵,λ系数和h指数。我们发现,总体而言,由RO-T1D队列诱导的共表达网络明显较弱,表现出广谱的有序性和控制性丧失。更具体地说,所有T1D家族队列在先天免疫基因之间诱导了更活跃和有序的转录协调,这与我们先前关于它们共享先天炎症状态增强的报道一致。另一方面,仅由LRS队列诱导适应性免疫基因的更高协调性,这可能解释了其患病风险低。所有网络措施也都指向同一个故事,此外,先天免疫基因在确定T1D家族队列的转录组状态中的重要性。接下来,我们整合了蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)和转录组共表达网络,并专门研究了PPI的最小功能单元,即蛋白质复合物(PC)。如果PC的共表达网络被渗透,则认为该PC在队列中是活动的。我们发现,RO-T1D群组激活的PC数量明显少于其他群组。总体而言,无论是共表达网络还是蛋白质相互作用网络,这四个队列均表现出惊人的差异,并且可以根据网络结构度量加以明确区分。相比之下,仅基因表达水平,不考虑潜在的相互作用网络,几乎无法区分这群人。总而言之,这些发现证明了在定义分子标记中基于优势网络的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号