首页> 外文会议>Transportation Research Board Annual meeting >ALTERNATIVE OR DERED RESPONSE FRAMEWORKS FOREXAMINING PEDESTRIAN INJURY SEVERITY IN NEW YORK CITY
【24h】

ALTERNATIVE OR DERED RESPONSE FRAMEWORKS FOREXAMINING PEDESTRIAN INJURY SEVERITY IN NEW YORK CITY

机译:替代或需求响应框架检查纽约市的行人伤害严重性

获取原文

摘要

This paper focuses on identifying the appropriate ordered response structure for modelingpedestrian injury severity. The alternative ordered response approaches considered for theempirical analysis include: ordered logit model (OL), generalized ordered logit model (GOL)and latent segmentation based ordered logit model (LSOL). The GOL and LSOL modelsenhance the traditional ordered logit model in different ways. The GOL model relaxes therestrictive thresholds in the ordered logit model by allowing for individual level exogenousvariable impacts on the threshold parameters. On the other hand, the LSOL model allows fordifferential impact on the alternatives by segmenting the pedestrian crash population into varioussegments with segment specific ordered logit parameters. In our study, we focus on examiningthe performance of these two model structures relative to the traditional OL model in the contextof pedestrian injury severity. The performance of the formulated injury severity models aretested based on the “New York City (NYC) Pedestrian Research Data Base” for the year of 2002through 2006. To our knowledge, the study provides a first of its kind comparison exerciseamong OL, GOL and LSOL models for examining pedestrian injury severity. The modelestimation results clearly highlight the presence of segmentation based on the crash location ofpedestrian accidents. The crash location attributes that affect the allocation of pedestrians intothese segments include: regional county, functional classification of roadway, pedestrian locationon roadway, number of travel lanes and number of parking lanes in the roadway system. The keyfactors influencing pedestrian injury severity are weather condition, lighting condition, vehicletypes, pedestrian age and season. Overall, the results of the empirical analysis provide credenceto the hypothesis that LSOL model is a promising ordered framework to accommodatepopulation heterogeneity in the context of pedestrian injury severity.
机译:本文着重于确定用于建模的适当的有序响应结构 行人受伤的严重程度。针对以下情况考虑的替代有序响应方法 实证分析包括:有序logit模型(OL),广义有序logit模型(GOL) 以及基于潜在细分的有序logit模型(LSOL)。 GOL和LSOL模型 以不同的方式增强传统的有序logit模型。 GOL模型放宽了 通过允许个体水平外生的有序logit模型中的限制性阈值 变量对阈值参数的影响。另一方面,LSOL模型允许 通过将行人撞车人口分为不同类别,对替代方案产生不同的影响 具有特定于段的有序logit参数的段。在我们的研究中,我们专注于检查 在上下文中,这两个模型结构相对于传统OL模型的性能 行人受伤的严重程度。制定的伤害严重性模型的性能为 根据2002年的“纽约市行人研究数据库”进行了测试 到2006年为止。据我们所知,该研究是同类研究中的首次 OL,GOL和LSOL模型中用于检查行人伤害严重程度的模型。该模型 估计结果清楚地表明了基于碰撞位置的细分的存在 行人交通事故。影响行人分配的碰撞位置属性 这些部分包括:地区县,道路功能分类,行人位置 道路系统中的行车道数量和停车道数量。钥匙 影响行人伤害严重程度的因素是天气条件,照明条件,车辆 类型,行人年龄和季节。总体而言,实证分析的结果提供了可信度 LSOL模型是一个有前途的有序框架,可以适应 行人伤害严重性背景下的人口异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号