首页> 外文会议>Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences >Formal Boundary Spanning and Informal Boundary Spanning in Cross-Border Knowledge Sharing: A Case Study
【24h】

Formal Boundary Spanning and Informal Boundary Spanning in Cross-Border Knowledge Sharing: A Case Study

机译:跨境知识共享中的正式边界和非正式边界跨越:一个案例研究

获取原文

摘要

The paper expands theoretical and empirical understanding of the interaction between formal boundary spanning mechanism (i.e. individuals formally nominated to span boundaries for knowledge sharing) and informal boundary spanning mechanism (i.e., informal seeking of information via social ties crossing boundaries) in a far-flung operation of a global company. Through a case study of engineering groups at a U.S. based manufacturing plant, we found that both formal and informal boundary spanning mechanisms had a positive effect on the ability of dispersed groups to identify and transfer remotely situated knowledge from other sites. However, we also found that the formal boundary spanning mechanism may have a suppressing effect on the informal boundary spanning mechanism when jointly pursued in certain circumstances. The findings call into question the implicit view of the boundary spanner and virtual team literatures that has largely portrayed the effects of both mechanisms on cross-boundary knowledge transfer as independent or complementary.
机译:本文扩展了对正式边界跨越机制之间的互动的理论和实证理解(即,正式被提名为知识共享的跨度)和非正式边界机制(即通过社交领域交叉边界的非正式寻求信息)在一个远方全球公司的运作。通过基于美国的制造工厂的工程群体的案例研究,我们发现,正式和非正式的边界跨越机制对分散团识别和转移远程地位从其他地点的知识的能力产生积极影响。然而,我们还发现,当在某些情况下共同追求时,正式的边界跨越机构可能对非正式边界跨越机制具有抑制作用。调查结果呼吁质疑边界扳手和虚拟团队文献的隐含视图,这主要描绘了两种机制对跨境知识转移作为独立或互补的影响的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号