首页> 外文会议>AIChE spring meeting;Global congress on process safety >The California Divide-And Why You Need To Engage Your Legislators
【24h】

The California Divide-And Why You Need To Engage Your Legislators

机译:加州分歧-以及为什么需要与立法者接洽

获取原文

摘要

California is crippled by a great divide that has nothing to do with tectonic plates.California's professional engineering statute gives civil engineers free reign, allowselectrical and mechanical engineers to work in their disciplines so long as that doesnot conflict with civil engineering, and acknowledges by title only that otherengineering disciplines exist.This division presents problems for engineers whether they have a professionalengineering license or not. For example, Spill Prevention Control andCountermeasure (SPCC) plans are mandated by federal regulations. Such plans areprepared by chemical engineers all over the country, but NOT in California. SPCCplans are part of the exclusive domain of civil engineers.A fire protection engineer was once told he could not design a fire suppressionsystem because that was the exclusive domain of mechanical engineers. A chemicalengineer was once told he could not submit a Risk Management Plan (RMP)(required by Cal EPA) without a civil engineer stamp because even the hazardanalysis on a facility that uses chemicals is the civil engineer's domain. These arejust a few examples where engineers are not allowed to work on projects thatsimilarly trained engineers are expected to do in the rest of the country and the restof the world.So how do engineers in California navigate this regulatory nightmare? And how dowe influence the legislators, engineering board, and others to nudge the statute in theright direction?California's answer included forming a coalition of professional engineering societiesthat work together to present a united voice. The California Legislative Council ofProfessional Engineers (CLCPE) not only represents the interests of engineeringprofessions to the legislature, but serves as a pro bono resource for the legislature ontechnical issues as well.This paper will discuss: (1) our lessons learned from working with legislators; (2)California's professional engineering statute and why it is written as it is; and (3) whyone needs to be engaged in the legislative process. Professional engineers areentrusted with protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Gettingengaged has the benefit of letting legislators understand the impact of their decisionsand allows engineers to serve the communities where they live, and provide a safer,better community for everyone.
机译:加利福尼亚被与构造板块无关的巨大鸿沟所破坏。 加州的专业工程法规赋予土木工程师自由统治权,允许 电气和机械工程师只要能做到就可以从事自己的学科 不会与土木工程发生冲突,并且仅按标题承认其他 存在工程学科。 这个部门给工程师带来了问题,无论他们是否有专业 工程许可与否。例如,溢漏预防控制和 对抗措施(SPCC)计划由联邦法规强制执行。这样的计划是 由全国各地的化学工程师准备,但不在加利福尼亚州。 SPCC 计划是土木工程师专有领域的一部分。 一位消防工程师曾被告知他无法设计灭火器 系统,因为那是机械工程师的专有领域。化学药品 工程师被告知无法提交风险管理计划(RMP) (由Cal EPA要求)没有土木工程师印章,因为即使有危险 对使用化学药品的设施进行分析是土木工程师的工作范围。这些是 仅有几个例子,其中不允许工程师从事那些 预计在全国其他地区和其他地区也将接受类似培训的工程师的工作 世界的。 那么,加利福尼亚的工程师如何应对这一监管梦night?以及怎么做 我们会影响立法者,工程委员会和其他机构,以便在法规中微调法规 正确的方向? 加利福尼亚的答案包括成立专业工程协会联盟 共同呈现出统一的声音。加州立法会 专业工程师(CLCPE)不仅代表了工程学的利益 向立法机关提供专业服务,但作为立法机关的无偿资源 技术问题。 本文将讨论:(1)我们与立法者合作的经验教训; (2) 加利福尼亚州的专业工程法规,以及为什么要照原样编写;和(3)为什么 需要参与立法过程。专业工程师是 受托保护公众的健康,安全和福祉。得到 参与的好处是让立法者了解其决定的影响 并允许工程师为他们所居住的社区提供服务,并提供更安全的服务, 每个人都有更好的社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号