首页> 外文会议>International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering >A comparison study of nonlinear and linear metrics in probing intrinsic brain networks from EEG data
【24h】

A comparison study of nonlinear and linear metrics in probing intrinsic brain networks from EEG data

机译:eEG数据探测内在大脑网络中的非线性和线性度量的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Functional intrinsic brain networks (IBNs) has been widely studied due to its close relationship to different brain functions and diseases. In these studies, linear metrics, e.g., correlation, have been commonly used in identifying brain networks, especially on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. However, nonlinear mechanism is believed to exist in forming brain networks. In the present study, we investigated the performance of a nonlinear metric, i.e., phase coherence, in probing brain networks, as compared with a linear metric, i.e., power correlation. Specifically, individual IBNs were firstly obtained by a time-frequency independent component analysis (tfICA), and then the interaction among them were probed using either phase coherence (inter-component phase coherence, ICPC) or power correlation coefficient (PCC). We examined them using high-density resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) data from a group of patients with a balance disorder who received repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatments. The results indicated that the use of ICPC indicated more detections of significant connectivity crossing multiple brain regions in various frequency bands than PCC. Moreover, consistent treatment-related network changes, as compared with previous neuroimaging findings, in this brain disorder were more successfully detected with ICPC. Therefore, it is important to use nonlinear metric in characterizing interactions between different brain regions and IBNs.
机译:由于其与不同脑功能和疾病的密切关系,功能性内在脑网络(IBNS)已被广泛研究。在这些研究中,线性度量,例如相关性,通常用于识别脑网络,尤其是在功能磁共振成像(FMRI)数据上。然而,认为非线性机制存在于形成脑网络中。在本研究中,与线性度量,即电力相关相比,我们研究了探测脑网络中的非线性度量,即相干性的性能。具体地,首先通过时频独立分量分析(TFICA)获得单个IBN,然后使用相干(分量间相位相干,ICPC)或电力相关系数(PCC)探测它们之间的相互作用。我们使用来自一组患者的高密度休息状态脑电图(EEG)数据进行了检查,该患者接受重复的经颅磁刺激(RTMS)治疗的平衡障碍。结果表明,使用ICPC的使用表明在各种频带中的多个脑区的显着连接的检测比PCC更多。此外,与先前的神经影像测验结果相比,与先前的神经影像测验结果相比,与先前的神经影像测定结果相比,这种脑障碍与ICPC更成功地检测到一致的治疗网络变化。因此,重要的是在表征不同脑区和IBN之间的相互作用时使用非线性度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号