首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cyber Conflict >The Role of International Human Rights Law in the Protection of Online Privacy in the Age of Surveillance
【24h】

The Role of International Human Rights Law in the Protection of Online Privacy in the Age of Surveillance

机译:国际人权法在监督时期在线隐私保护的作用

获取原文

摘要

Whilst the political dust on mass surveillance is slowly settling down, what has become apparent is the uncertainty regarding the interpretation and application of the right to privacy norms under Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 in the context of cyberspace. Despite the world-wide condemnation of these practices by, inter alia, the United Nations and international human rights organisations, little consensus has been reached on how to bring them in line with international human rights law. This paper proposes that the most pragmatic solution is updating Article 17 by replacing General Comment No. 16. There are many issues that require attention. The paper focuses on two fundamental aspects of this process, namely the development of more detailed understanding of what is meant by the right to privacy in the 21st century, and the challenge posed by foreign cyber surveillance to the principle of extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. To that end, the paper identifies that the 'effective control' test, developed by international human rights courts and bodies adopted to determine jurisdiction, is unsuitable in the context of state-sponsored cyber surveillance. The paper considers a number of suggestions made by legal scholars, which hinge on the control of communications, rather than the physical control over areas or individuals. Such a 'virtual control' approach seems in line with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, according to which extraterritorial obligations may arise when states exercise authority and control over an individual's human rights, despite not having physical control over that individual. The paper argues that the 'virtual control' test, understood as a remote control over the individual's right to privacy of communications, may help to close the normative gap that state intelligence agencies keenly exploit at the moment.
机译:虽然大众监视的政治粉尘正在慢慢地稳定下来,但明显的是有关在网络空间背景下的“国际公民权利和政治权利国际公约”第17条下的隐私规范的解释和应用的不确定性。尽管除其他外,除非外,否则谴责这些做法,尤其是联合国和国际人权组织,就如何符合国际人权法,达成了很少的共识。本文提出最务实的解决方案正在通过更换第16号普遍评论更新第17条。有许多需要注意的问题。本文重点介绍了这一过程的两个基本方面,即开发更详细地了解21世纪隐私权的内容,以及国外网络监测对人权条约的域​​外应用原则的挑战。为此,本文确定了国际人权法院和通过通过用于确定管辖权的机构制定的“有效控制”测试在国家赞助的网络监测范围内不适合。本文考虑了法律学者提出的若干建议,这些建议符合对通信的控制,而不是对地区或个人的物理控制。这种“虚拟控制”方法似乎符合欧洲人权法庭的法学,根据该域名可能会在国家行使权限和控制个人的人权方面,尽管没有对该个人进行物理控制。本文认为,“虚拟控制”测试被理解为对个人的私密性宣传权的遥控器,可能有助于关闭国家情报机构敏锐地利用的规范性差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号