首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference >A ?242dB FOM and ?75dBc-reference-spur ring-DCO-based all-digital PLL using a fast phase-error correction technique and a low-power optimal-threshold TDC
【24h】

A ?242dB FOM and ?75dBc-reference-spur ring-DCO-based all-digital PLL using a fast phase-error correction technique and a low-power optimal-threshold TDC

机译:a?242db fom和?75dbc-readio-spur Ring-DCO的全数字PLL使用快速相位纠错技术和低功耗最佳阈值TDC

获取原文

摘要

To improve efficiency in the use of silicon, there have been many efforts to develop ring-oscillator-based clock generators with low jitter. A PLL using a fast phase-error correction (FPEC) technique [1] is one promising architecture. By emulating the phase-realignment mechanism of an injection-locked clock multiplier (ILCM), the FPEC PLL can achieve ultra-low jitter that is almost comparable to that of ILCMs. In addition, since the FPEC PLL has an integrator in its transfer function, it can also achieve a low reference spur and a high multiplication factor (N), which is different from ILCMs. However, the FPEC PLL of an analog implementation in [1] has difficulty maintaining optimal loop characteristics, which vary easily due to PVT variations or a change in the output frequency. To facilitate the calibration of loop characteristics, the FPEC can be implemented in an all-digital PLL (ADPLL), increasing the control word of a DCO, DFCW, in a very short duration, TFPEC, as shown in Fig. 25.4.1. Since the FPEC technique can rapidly remove the accumulated jitter of the DCO from the previous reference period, fREF, the variance of the output jitter, VAR[JOUT](f), becomes saw-tooth-shaped along with the accumulating jitter. In a conventional ADPLL, the accumulated jitter is removed gradually over TREF, so the variance of the jitter is nearly constant [2]. This difference enables the FPEC ADPLL to have much lower RMS jitter, σRMS. However, the FPEC ADPLL is limited in its ability to achieve extremely low jitter, i.e., it cannot reduce σRMSas much as analog FPEC PLLs can. This is because typical ADPLL TDCs provides less precise information regarding the oscillator jitter than a PD does in analog PLLs. When it detects a timing error, τerr, a TDC generates a digitized value, DTDC; thus, the amount of error to be corrected becomes rather than τerr. This results in a quantization error, τq, thereby increasing σrms. To minimize τq(or E[τq2]), the resolution of a TDC must be improved significantly to a level at which the quantity of jitter can be distinguished, but this is difficult when a typical CMOS process is used. Even if the design itself were possible, additional power would be required to generate many evenly spaced time thresholds.
机译:为了提高硅效率,有很多努力开发基于环形振荡器的时钟发生器,具有低抖动。使用快速阶段纠错(FPEC)技术[1]的PLL是一个有前途的架构。通过模拟注射锁定时钟倍增器(ILCM)的相位调节机构,FPEC PLL可以实现与ILCMS几乎相当的超低抖动。另外,由于FPEC PLL在其传递函数中具有积分器,因此它还可以实现低参考刺激和高乘法因子(N),其与ILCMS不同。然而,在[1]中的模拟实现的FPEC PLL难以保持最佳的循环特性,其由于PVT变化或输出频率的变化而变化很大。为了便于校准循环特性,可以在全数字PLL(ADPLL)中实现FPEC,增加DCO的控制字 fcw ,在非常短的持续时间里 fpec ,如图25.4.1所示。由于FPEC技术可以从先前的参考时段,F迅速移除DCO的累积抖动 ref ,输出抖动的差异var [J out ](F),与积聚抖动变成锯齿状。在传统的ADPLL中,累积的抖动逐渐除去 ref ,所以抖动的差异几乎是恒定的[2]。这种差异使得FPEC ADPLL能够具有更低的RMS抖动,σ rms 。然而,FPEC ADPLL的能力有限,即实现极低的抖动,即,它不能减少σ rms 尽可能多的模拟FPEC PLL。这是因为典型的ADPLL TDC提供关于振荡器抖动的更少的精确信息,而不是模拟PLL中的PD。当它检测到定时错误时,τ err ,TDC生成数字化值,d tdc ;因此,要纠正的误差量变为而不是τ Err 。这导致量化误差τ q ,从而增加σ rms 。最小化τ. q (或e [τ q 2 ]),必须显着提高TDC的分辨率到可以区分抖动量的水平,但是当使用典型的CMOS工艺时,这很难。即使设计本身是可能的,也需要额外的功率来产生许多均匀间隔的时间阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号