首页> 外文会议>CICC-7;China international conference on high-performance ceramics >Influence of Thickness on Residual Stress Profile in Veneering Ceramic Layered: Measurement by Hole-drilling
【24h】

Influence of Thickness on Residual Stress Profile in Veneering Ceramic Layered: Measurement by Hole-drilling

机译:厚度对贴面陶瓷层状残余应力分布的影响:钻孔测量

获取原文

摘要

To compare thickness of veneering ceramics dependence of the stress profile in veneering ceramic layered on zirconia and metal frameworks. Cylindrical core materials dentine ceramic specimens whose diameter is 20.0mm, thickness is 0.5mm were made with customized method, and then Upcera zirconia and metal plate were veneered, the thickness of the veneering ceramics respectively were 1.25mm, 1.50mm and 1.75mm, a total of six groups (n=10). An CAD-CAM machine was used for the drilling procedure and residual stress profile of all-ceramic crowns and metal-ceramic crowns was calculated. The mean residual stress of zirconia all-ceramic restorations were: respecitively, 60.15±5.54MPa for 1.25mm thickness of veneering; 53.37±5.12MPa for 1.50mm thickness of veneering; 45.64±4.53MPa for 1.75mm thickness of veneering. The mean residual stress of glass infiltrated alumina all-ceramic restorations were: respectively, 61.32± 5.76MPa for 1.25mm thickness of veneering; 52.45±5.35MPa for 1.50mm thickness of veneering; 45.89±4.26MPa for 1.75mm thickness of veneering. Residual stress profile of all-ceramic restorations was significantly different among specimen groups of Y-TZP and Metal plate (P>0.05). There was also significantly different among specimen groups which had same thickness of the veneering ceramics but not belonged to same frameworks (P<0.01). As the depth increases, the stress gradually increases, reaching the maximum at the interface of MV or CV. The residual stress of frameworks was tensile stress, but the residual stress of veneering porcelain interior was compress. With the veneer porcelain thickness, the residual stress of the interface gradually reduce.
机译:为了比较饰面陶瓷的厚度,氧化锆和金属框架上的饰面陶瓷的应力分布与应力分布的关系。采用定制方法制备直径为20.0mm,厚度为0.5mm的圆柱状牙本质陶瓷标本,然后将Upcera氧化锆和金属板贴面,饰面陶瓷的厚度分别为1.25mm,1.50mm和1.75mm,总共六个组(n = 10)。使用CAD-CAM机器进行钻孔程序,并计算了全陶瓷冠和金属陶瓷冠的残余应力分布。氧化锆全瓷修复体的平均残余应力为:1.25mm厚度的饰面分别为60.15±5.54MPa; 1.50mm饰面厚度为53.37±5.12MPa;饰面厚度1.75mm时为45.64±4.53MPa。玻璃渗透氧化铝全陶瓷修复体的平均残余应力分别为:1.25mm饰面厚度为61.32±5.76MPa。 1.50mm厚度的饰面为52.45±5.35MPa;饰面厚度1.75mm时为45.89±4.26MPa。 Y-TZP和金属板样本组之间的全瓷修复体的残余应力分布差异显着(P> 0.05)。具有相同厚度的饰面陶瓷但不属于相同骨架的标本组之间也存在显着差异(P <0.01)。随着深度的增加,应力逐渐增加,在MV或CV的界面处达到最大值。框架的残余应力为拉应力,而饰面瓷内部的残余应力受到压缩。随着贴面瓷的厚度,界面的残余应力逐渐减小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号