首页> 外文会议>Annual highway geology symposium >Maud Farm Road Investigation
【24h】

Maud Farm Road Investigation

机译:Maud农场道路调查

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper presents the findings of an extensive site investigation into the causes of embankment settlement over five flexible pipe culverts ranging respectively in 36,24, 36, 36, and twin 48 inch diameter. The site location is on an east-west County Road 131 near Maud, Oklahoma. The project was developed and designed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). The issue here concerned a lawsuit brought by the BIA against the contractor in which the BIA wanted to know if the contractor could be held libel for the embankment settlement. At stake was contact retainer held by the BIA in the sum of $358,000 against the contactor. The site geology consists of very shallow alluvial soils and/ or residual soil underlain predominately sandstone and sandstone and interbedded shale in the narrow drainways. The embankment was constructed from roadway cut sections containing residual sandy and clayey soils underlain by sandstones and sandstone interbedded with shale. The site landscape is one of shallow rolling hills. The field investigation consisted of a total of 15 piezocone soundings at the site. Soil properties of the embankment material, the underlying shallow alluvial and/or residual soil, and underlying geology were inferred from the piezocone tip resistance (q_c) and friction ratio (R_f). Three piezocone soundings were made in a staggered pattern at each of the five pipe locations in as close a proximity to the pipe centerline as possible. The analysis used software for the analysis of buried structures, Cande-2007 Update Release 7/31/2011, Version 1.0.0.7. This software uses a finite element mesh analysis. A detailed analysis revealed that the settlement at each pipe location was due to deformation below the pipe grades. The piezocone tip resistances in the embankment indicated a very stiff material and did not support the BIA claim that the contractor was responsible for the subsidence above the pipe culverts. The analysis showed that the settlements were the result of vertical pressure against a yielding base, a concept borrowed from theoretical soil mechanics.
机译:本文介绍了广泛的现场调查,分别在36,24,36,36和双48英寸的36,24,36和双48英寸范围内进行大量柔性管罩的堤防沉降原因。该网站地点位于俄克拉荷马州Maud附近的东西县131号县。该项目由印度事务局(BIA)开发和设计。这里的问题涉及BIA对BIA想要了解承包商是否可以为堤防解决方案持有诽谤的承包商而带来的诉讼。在股权上是由BIA持有的接触保留,以358,000美元的比例为358,000美元。该网站地质包括非常浅的冲积土壤和/或残余土壤,主要是砂岩和砂岩和砂岩中的涉及狭窄排水管的页岩。该路堤由涉及砂岩和砂岩嵌入的砂岩和夹层粘土的巷道切片构建。网站景观是浅水山之一。现场调查包括在网站上共有15个压电型探测。从压电尖尖电阻(Q_C)和摩擦比(R_F)中推断出堤防材料的土壤性质,潜在的浅冲积和/或残余土壤和潜在地质。在五个管位置中的每一个以交错图案制造三个压电织,尽可能靠近管道中心线。分析用于分析埋藏结构的软件,Cande-2007更新版本7/31/2011,1.0.0.7版。该软件使用有限元网格分析。详细分析显示,每个管道位置的沉降是由于管道等级以下的变形。堤防中的压电膜尖端电阻表示了非常僵硬的材料,并不支持BIA声称承包商负责管道涵洞上方的沉降。分析表明,沉降是对屈服基地垂直压力的结果,这是一种从理论土壤机械借来的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号