首页> 外文会议>OMAE2010;International conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering >COMPARISON OF UMBILICAL INSTALLATION ANALYSIS USING TWO IRREGULAR WAVE SPECTRA
【24h】

COMPARISON OF UMBILICAL INSTALLATION ANALYSIS USING TWO IRREGULAR WAVE SPECTRA

机译:两种不规则波谱的UMB进行安装分析的比较

获取原文

摘要

Umbilicals are widely used to provide monitoring and control functions for distant satellite wellheads in subsea developments. Detailed analysis is required to predict the behavior of the umbilical during the installation process.Finite Element Analysis is performed to determine the limiting operational sea-state for the installation operations. This paper presents work carried out with Acergy Norway AS, comparing two irregular wave spectra that are commonly used for installation analysis in the North Sea. The purpose of the study is to select the most suitable method for the installation analysis with respect to different types of installation operations. Selection is carried out based on several limiting criteria, including top tension, compression, minimum bending radius and the tension at the touchdown point.The JONSWAP spectrum and Torsethaugen spectrum are used to model the physical environment of the North Sea. Both of these spectra are especially designed for North Sea environment. The JONSWAP spectrum represents the fetch-limited (or coastal) wind generated seas, meanwhile the Torsethaugen spectrum represents the wave conditions in open ocean areas where the waves are dominated not only by local wind seas but are also exposed to swells (Torsethaugen and Haver, 2004).Two types of installation operations are selected for this work, which are the "buoyancy overboarding" for dynamic umbilical installation analysis and "normal lay" for static umbilical installation analysis.The analysis shows that the Torsethaugen spectrum generates higher tension forces compared to the JONSWAP spectrum. On the other hand, the JONSWAP spectrum generates higher compression and lower bending radius. However, the differences between the results using these two spectra are not large. This is due to the limited wave height and period applicable for installation operations. This work only covers wave height of Hs = 2.5 - 4.0 m and wave period of Tp = 6 -14 s. The selection of these low conditions is based on typical sea states for installation operation (without consideration of survival conditions).Since there is only small variation on the results from the two spectra, both JONSWAP and Torstehaugen spectra are considered suitable for analysis of installation operations. It is further noted that although the Torstehaugen spectra will often provide a more realistic representation of the physical environment, forecast or measured weather data is rarely presented in this form, therefore the JONSWAP or other single peak spectra must be used for decision making offshore. This study has validated that for the range of condition studied, this is an acceptable approach.The conclusion from this study is only applicable for low sea-states and without considering effects from different direction of wind seas and swells components in the Torsethaugen spectrum. Therefore further work is required to fully asses the impact of directionality between the wave components and the impact of higher sea states which are applicable to survival conditions.
机译:在海底开发中,脐带被广泛用于为遥远的卫星井口提供监视和控制功能。需要进行详细的分析以预测脐带在安装过程中的行为。 执行有限元分析以确定安装操作的极限操作海况。本文介绍了使用Acergy Norway AS进行的工作,比较了北海安装分析中常用的两个不规则波谱。研究的目的是针对不同类型的安装操作选择最适合的安装分析方法。根据几个限制条件进行选择,包括最高张力,压缩,最小弯曲半径和着陆点的张力。 JONSWAP光谱和Torsethaugen光谱用于模拟北海的物理环境。这两个光谱都是专门为北海环境设计的。 JONSWAP频谱代表受风限制的(或沿海)风产生的海洋,而Torsethaugen频谱代表开放海域的波浪条件,在这些海洋中,波浪不仅受到当地风海的控制,而且还受到海浪的影响(Torsethaugen和Haver, 2004)。 为此工作选择了两种安装操作类型,分别是用于动态脐带安装分析的“浮力舷外”和用于静态脐带安装分析的“正常铺设”。 分析表明,与JONSWAP光谱相比,Torsethaugen光谱产生更高的张力。另一方面,JONSWAP光谱产生更高的压缩率和更低的弯曲半径。但是,使用这两个光谱的结果之间的差异并不大。这是由于适用于安装操作的波高和周期有限。这项工作仅涵盖了Hs = 2.5-4.0 m的波高和Tp = 6 -14 s的波周期。这些低条件的选择基于安装操作的典型海况(不考虑生存条件)。 由于两个光谱的结果只有很小的差异,因此JONSWAP和Torstehaugen光谱都被认为适合于安装操作的分析。还要注意的是,尽管Torstehaugen谱图通常会提供物理环境的更真实的表示,但很少以这种形式提供天气预报或实测气象数据,因此必须使用JONSWAP或其他单峰谱图进行海上决策。这项研究已经证实,对于所研究的疾病范围,这是可以接受的方法。 这项研究得出的结论仅适用于低海状态,而未考虑Torsethaugen谱中不同方向的风浪和涌浪分量的影响。因此,需要进一步的工作来充分评估波浪分量之间的方向性影响和适用于生存条件的较高海况的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号