首页> 外文会议>Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS 2006) vol.6 >Can Critical Realism 'inform' Information Systems?
【24h】

Can Critical Realism 'inform' Information Systems?

机译:批判现实主义可以“通知”信息系统吗?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Being an essentially multi-disciplinary field, Information Systems does not appear to be informed by a single dominant underlying philosophy. Since IT is an integral part of IS, its philosophical roots are associated with logical positivism. While logical positivism has several merits, its proponents have been unable to respond to criticisms leveled by the Humean Skeptics. Logical empiricism took an asymptotic view with the concept of 'gradually increasing confirmation' through 'inter-subjective certification'. It was challenged and relativism was touted as the epistemologically superior philosophy. However, relativism could not sustain its prominence in IS because of its inherent reliance on tautological arguments. In the last decade, Scientific Realism seems to have emerged as a viable philosophy. In this paper, we argue that Critical Realism, a variant of Scientific Realism, has considerable potential to become the dominant philosophical tradition in the field of Information Systems.
机译:作为一个本质上是多学科的领域,信息系统似乎并不受单一主导基础哲学的影响。由于IT是IS不可或缺的一部分,因此其哲学根源与逻辑实证主义相关。虽然逻辑实证主义有几个优点,但它的支持者却无法回应Humean怀疑论者提出的批评。逻辑经验主义通过“主体间认证”的“逐渐增加的确认”的概念采取了渐近的观点。它受到了挑战,相对论被吹捧为认识论上的优越哲学。然而,相对论由于其固有地依赖于重言式论证而无法在IS中保持其突出地位。在过去的十年中,科学现实主义似乎已经成为一种可行的哲学。在本文中,我们认为批判现实主义是科学现实主义的一种变体,具有很大的潜力,可以成为信息系统领域中占主导地位的哲学传统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号