首页> 外文会议>International system safety conference >Aviation Accident Aetiology:A Systemic Examination of FratricideUsing Actor Network Theory
【24h】

Aviation Accident Aetiology:A Systemic Examination of FratricideUsing Actor Network Theory

机译:航空事故病因学:基于Actor网络理论的一次杀伤性系统检查

获取原文

摘要

With the advent of complex coupled systems and the evolutionary introduction of new technology, the aetiology ofaccidents is changing. “Since World War II, we are increasingly experiencing a new type of accident that arises inthe interactions among components (electromechanical, digital, and human) rather than the failure of individualcomponents. Perrow coined the term ‘system accident’ to describe it.”(Ref. 1) This suggests the requirement tomove beyond the linear Event-based models of accident causation to one that is systemically oriented and considersthe socio-technical characteristics of systems. Accident surveys in aviation have attributed 70% of incidents to crewerror citing pilot error as the root cause of an aviation accident. (Ref. 2) This limited view of accident causationreflects a fundamental misunderstanding regarding the aetiology of aviation accidents. To better understand aviationaccident aetiology, it is necessary to describe the complex coupling of factors that contribute to its evolution.“Complex systems cannot be understood by studying parts in isolation. The very essence of the system lies in theinteraction between parts and the overall behavior that emerges from the interactions.”(Ref. 3) Sociology offers aninteresting approach to looking at the socio-technical elements of systems through the application of Actor NetworkTheory (ANT). The systems perspective of ANT looks at the inter-connectedness of the heterogeneous elementscharacterized by the technological and non-technological (human, social, organizational) elements. In this work,Actor Network Theory is used to examine the complex interconnectivity of heterogeneous elements associated withaviation accident aetiology. The aetiology of the Desert Storm fratricide incident of 17 February 1991, involving theaccidental destruction of two friendly vehicles by two Hellfire missiles fired from an Apache helicopter, will beexamined through the application of ANT.
机译:随着复杂的耦合系统的出现和新技术的不断演进,人类的病因 事故正在改变。 “自第二次世界大战以来,我们越来越多地经历着一种新型事故, 组件(机电,数字和人机)之间的相互作用,而不是个体的失败 成分。 Perrow创造了“系统事故”一词来形容它。(参考资料1) 超越了基于事件的线性线性事件因果模型,转向了系统性的并考虑到 系统的社会技术特征。航空事故调查将70%的事故归因于机组人员 错误是将飞行员错误作为航空事故的根本原因。 (参考文献2)这种事故因果关系的局限性 反映了对航空事故起因的根本误解。为了更好地了解航空 事故病因学,有必要描述导致其演变的因素的复杂耦合。 “不能通过孤立地研究零件来理解复杂的系统。该系统的本质在于 零件之间的相互作用以及从相互作用中产生的整体行为。”(参考文献3)社会学提供了一个 通过Actor网络的应用来研究系统的社会技术要素的有趣方法 理论(ANT)。 ANT的系统视角着眼于异构元素的相互联系 以技术和非技术(人类,社会,组织)要素为特征。在这项工作中, Actor网络理论用于检查与以下内容相关联的异构元素的复杂互连性 航空事故的病因学。 1991年2月17日的“沙漠风暴”自相残杀事件的病因,涉及 阿帕奇直升机发射的两枚地狱火导弹意外摧毁了两辆友军车辆, 通过ANT的应用进行了检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号