首页> 外文会议>Americas Conference on Information Systems >Differences in Contracting: Anchoring Formal and Relational Norms within BPO Governance
【24h】

Differences in Contracting: Anchoring Formal and Relational Norms within BPO Governance

机译:承包的差异:锚定在BPO治理中的正式和关系规范

获取原文

摘要

Within IS outsourcing research there is an ongoing discussion whether formal contracts and relational norms function as substitutes or as complements to each other. However, even those deals which are based on relational norms usually comprise a contract as their foundation. We therefore aim at analyzing differences in contracting between both governance modes (i.e. contract-based or based on relational norms) and exploring their impact on outsourcing satisfaction. Based on a survey with 335 Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) deals in the German banking industry we show that clauses on problem resolution are most important in BPO contract design. Furthermore, we find that deals focusing on formal governance put a lot of emphasis on the design of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) whereas deals focusing on relational governance pay special attention to the unambiguousness of outsourcing objectives.
机译:在外包研究中,持续讨论是否正式合同和关系规范函数作为替代品或互相补充。然而,即使这些基于关系规范的交易通常包括合同作为其基础。因此,我们旨在分析治理模式(即基于合同或基于关系规范)之间的缔约区的差异,并探索其对外包满意度的影响。基于德国银行业的335个业务流程外包(BPO)交易的一项调查,我们展示了问题解决方案的条款在BPO合同设计中最重要。此外,我们发现关注正式治理的交易会强调服务级别协议(SLA)的设计,而重点关注关系治理的特点则特别注意外包目标的明确裁定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号